STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine whether a point-of-care intervention that navigates willing, low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED) to a Primary Care Clinic will increase future primary care follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental trial at an urban safety net hospital. Adults presenting to the ED for select low-acuity problems were eligible. Patients were excluded if arriving by emergency medical services, if febrile, or if the triage nurse believed they required ED care. We enrolled 965 patients. Navigators escorted a subset of willing participants to the Primary Care Clinic (in the same hospital complex), where they were assigned a personal physician, were given an overview of clinic services, and received same-day clinic care. The primary outcome was Primary Care Clinic follow-up within 1 year of the index ED visit among patients having no previous primary care provider. RESULTS: In the bivariate intention-to-treat analysis, 50.3% of intervention group patients versus 36.9% of control group patients with no previous primary care provider had at least 1 Primary Care Clinic follow-up visit in the year after the intervention. In the multivariable analysis, the absolute difference in having at least 1 Primary Care Clinic follow-up for the intervention group compared with the control group was 9.3% (95% confidence interval 2.2% to 16.3%). There was no significant difference in the number of future ED visits. CONCLUSION: A point-of-care intervention offering low-acuity ED patients the opportunity to alternatively be treated at the hospital's Primary Care Clinic resulted in increased future primary care follow-up compared with standard ED referral practices.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine whether a point-of-care intervention that navigates willing, low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED) to a Primary Care Clinic will increase future primary care follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental trial at an urban safety net hospital. Adults presenting to the ED for select low-acuity problems were eligible. Patients were excluded if arriving by emergency medical services, if febrile, or if the triage nurse believed they required ED care. We enrolled 965 patients. Navigators escorted a subset of willing participants to the Primary Care Clinic (in the same hospital complex), where they were assigned a personal physician, were given an overview of clinic services, and received same-day clinic care. The primary outcome was Primary Care Clinic follow-up within 1 year of the index ED visit among patients having no previous primary care provider. RESULTS: In the bivariate intention-to-treat analysis, 50.3% of intervention group patients versus 36.9% of control group patients with no previous primary care provider had at least 1 Primary Care Clinic follow-up visit in the year after the intervention. In the multivariable analysis, the absolute difference in having at least 1 Primary Care Clinic follow-up for the intervention group compared with the control group was 9.3% (95% confidence interval 2.2% to 16.3%). There was no significant difference in the number of future ED visits. CONCLUSION: A point-of-care intervention offering low-acuity ED patients the opportunity to alternatively be treated at the hospital's Primary Care Clinic resulted in increased future primary care follow-up compared with standard ED referral practices.
Authors: Feifei Ye; Layla Parast; Ron D Hays; Marc N Elliott; Kirsten Becker; William G Lehrman; Debra Stark; Steven Martino Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Wendy A M H Thijssen; Elske van Mierlo; Elske van Miero; Maartje Willekens; Jasper Rebel; Maro H Sandel; Paul Giesen; Michel Wensing Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amanda S Carmel; Peter Steel; Robert Tanouye; Aleksey Novikov; Sunday Clark; Sanjai Sinha; Judy Tung Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-14
Authors: Meng-Han Tsai; Sudha Xirasagar; Scott Carroll; Charles S Bryan; Pamela J Gallagher; Kim Davis; Edward C Jauch Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Russell Hill; Albert Gest; Cynthia Smith; Jose H Guardiola; Michael Apolinario; Joann Ha; Jose R Gonzalez; Peter B Richman Journal: PeerJ Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 2.984