Literature DB >> 23261018

Attenuation of centre-of-pressure trajectory fluctuations under the prosthetic foot when using an articulating hydraulic ankle attachment compared to fixed attachment.

Alan R De Asha1, Louise Johnson, Ramesh Munjal, Jai Kulkarni, John G Buckley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disruptions to the progress of the centre-of-pressure trajectory beneath prosthetic feet have been reported previously. These disruptions reflect how body weight is transferred over the prosthetic limb and are governed by the compliance of the prosthetic foot device and its ability to simulate ankle function. This study investigated whether using an articulating hydraulic ankle attachment attenuates centre-of-pressure trajectory fluctuations under the prosthetic foot compared to a fixed attachment.
METHODS: Twenty active unilateral trans-tibial amputees completed walking trials at their freely-selected, comfortable walking speed using both their habitual foot with either a rigid or elastic articulating attachment and a foot with a hydraulic ankle attachment. Centre-of-pressure displacement and velocity fluctuations beneath the prosthetic foot, prosthetic shank angular velocity during stance, and walking speed were compared between foot conditions.
FINDINGS: Use of the hydraulic device eliminated or reduced the magnitude of posteriorly directed centre-of-pressure displacements, reduced centre-of-pressure velocity variability across single-support, increased mean forward angular velocity of the shank during early stance, and increased freely chosen comfortable walking speed (P ≤ 0.002).
INTERPRETATION: The attenuation of centre-of-pressure trajectory fluctuations when using the hydraulic device indicated bodyweight was transferred onto the prosthetic limb in a smoother, less faltering manner which allowed the centre of mass to translate more quickly over the foot.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23261018     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  Understanding adaptive gait in lower-limb amputees: insights from multivariate analyses.

Authors:  John G Buckley; Alan R De Asha; Louise Johnson; Clive B Beggs
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  The influence of a hydraulic prosthetic ankle on residual limb loading during sloped walking.

Authors:  Sara R Koehler-McNicholas; Eric A Nickel; Joseph Medvec; Kyle Barrons; Spencer Mion; Andrew H Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 5): Impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot categories for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.

Authors:  Shane R Wurdeman; Phillip M Stevens; James H Campbell
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2019-02-13

4.  STEPFORWARD study: a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot for older patients with vascular-related amputations.

Authors:  Natalie Vanicek; Elizabeth Coleman; Judith Watson; Kerry Bell; Catriona McDaid; Cleveland Barnett; Martin Twiste; Fergus Jepson; Abayomi Salawu; Dennis Harrison; Natasha Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Free-Living User Perspectives on Musculoskeletal Pain and Patient-Reported Mobility With Passive and Powered Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Components: A Pragmatic, Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Andreas Kannenberg; Arri R Morris; Karl D Hibler
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-01-14

6.  The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; John G Buckley
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; Ramesh Munjal; Jai Kulkarni; John G Buckley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  A biomechanical assessment of hydraulic ankle-foot devices with and without micro-processor control during slope ambulation in trans-femoral amputees.

Authors:  Xuefei Bai; David Ewins; Andrew David Crocombe; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.