Literature DB >> 2326096

Differential responses of nociceptive vs. non-nociceptive spinal dorsal horn neurones to cutaneously applied vibration in the cat.

M W Salter1, J L Henry.   

Abstract

Extracellular single-unit recordings were made from dorsal horn neurones in the lumbar spinal cord of cats which were anaesthetized or were anaemically decerebrated. Each neurone was classified functionally as wide dynamic range (WDR), non-nociceptive, nociceptive specific or proprioceptive. Vibration was then applied to the hind limb using a feedback-controlled mechanical stimulator. WDR neurones had 3 distinct types of response to vibration (80 Hz: 0.3-1.0 mm): excitation, depression and a biphasic response consisting of excitation followed by depression. The type of response depended upon the location of the stimulator probe. With the stimulator probe placed inside that part of the receptive field from which low intensity, non-vibrational cutaneous stimuli elicited excitation, 35 neurones were excited by the vibratory stimulation, none was depressed and 4 showed the biphasic response. On the other hand, when the probe was positioned outside the receptive field for low intensity stimuli, 7 WDR neurones were excited, 164 showed depression or the biphasic response and 7 were unaffected. On-going activity and activity evoked by iontophoretic application of glutamate were decreased during the depressant response and during the depressant phase of the biphasic response. In terms of non-nociceptive neurones, all (n = 30) were excited by vibration; depressant or biphasic responses were not observed. Excitation was elicited by placing the probe either inside or outside the receptive field for non-vibrational stimuli. All nociceptive specific neurones (n = 3) were depressed by vibration regardless of the position of the stimulus. All proprioceptive neurones (n = 12) were excited by vibration. The predominantly depressant effect of vibration on nociceptive neurones vs. the predominantly excitatory effect on non-nociceptive neurones prompts us to suggest that the increase in pain threshold and the clinical analgesia elicited by vibration may be mediated at the spinal level by a decrease in the rate of firing of nociceptive neurones and/or by excitation of non-nociceptive neurones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2326096     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)91128-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction.

Authors:  Pavel Goldstein; Irit Weissman-Fogel; Guillaume Dumas; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Attenuation of experimental pain by vibro-tactile stimulation in patients with chronic local or widespread musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson; Casey T Goldman; Donald D Price
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Identification of spinal circuits transmitting and gating mechanical pain.

Authors:  Bo Duan; Longzhen Cheng; Steeve Bourane; Olivier Britz; Christopher Padilla; Lidia Garcia-Campmany; Michael Krashes; Wendy Knowlton; Tomoko Velasquez; Xiangyu Ren; Sarah Ross; Bradford B Lowell; Yun Wang; Martyn Goulding; Qiufu Ma
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Low-Threshold Mechanosensitive VGLUT3-Lineage Sensory Neurons Mediate Spinal Inhibition of Itch by Touch.

Authors:  Kent Sakai; Kristen M Sanders; Shing-Hong Lin; Darya Pavlenko; Hideki Funahashi; Taisa Lozada; Shuanglin Hao; Chih-Cheng Chen; Tasuku Akiyama
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Purinergic signalling in spinal pain processing.

Authors:  Theresa H Tam; Michael W Salter
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.765

6.  Effects of different vibration frequencies on spinal cord reflex circuits and thermoalgesic perception.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Sergiu Albu; Semra Oguz; Narda Murillo; Giuseppe Lucente; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Interaction Matters: The Effect of Touching the Social Robot PARO on Pain and Stress is Stronger When Turned ON vs. OFF.

Authors:  Nirit Geva; Netta Hermoni; Shelly Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Pain relief by touch: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  Flavia Mancini; Thomas Nash; Gian Domenico Iannetti; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  An Innovative and Portable Multimodal Pain Relief Device for the Management of Neuropathic Low Back Pain - a Study from Kashmir (Southeast Asia).

Authors:  Shah Faisal Ahmad Tarfarosh; Baseer-Ul-Rasool Lone; Mirza-Idrees-Ul-Haq Beigh; Mushbiq Manzoor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-06-29

10.  Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses.

Authors:  Flavia Mancini; Anne-Lise Beaumont; Li Hu; Patrick Haggard; Gian Domenico D Iannetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.