Literature DB >> 23260857

Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials.

Carmen Rubio1, José Bellver, Lorena Rodrigo, Ernesto Bosch, Amparo Mercader, Carmen Vidal, Maria José De los Santos, Juan Giles, Elena Labarta, Javier Domingo, Juana Crespo, José Remohí, Antonio Pellicer, Carlos Simón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for two different indications: repetitive implantation failure (RIF) and advanced maternal age (AMA).
DESIGN: Two prospective, randomized controlled trials with patients allocated in two arms: blastocyst transfer on day 5 (group A) or PGS with transfer on day 5 (group B).
SETTING: University-affiliated private clinics. PATIENT(S): The RIF study included women <40 years with three or more failed IVF cycles without other known causal factors (91 patients). The AMA study included intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients aged between 41 and 44 (183 patients). INTERVENTION(S): In the PGS group, single-cell day 3 biopsy was performed with aneuploidy screening for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y. In both the blastocyst transfer group and the PGS group, ET was performed on day 5. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live-birth rate per patient and per started cycle. RESULT(S): A significant increase in live-birth rates per patient was found in the PGS group compared with the blastocyst group for the AMA study (30/93 patients [32.3%] vs. 14/90 patients [15.5%]; odds ratio, 2.585; confidence interval, [1.262-5.295]). In the RIF study no significant differences were observed (23/48 patients [47.9%] vs. 12/43 patients [27.9%]). CONCLUSION(S): PGS with FISH was shown to be beneficial for the AMA group.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23260857     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

1.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  One thousand seventy-eight autologous IVF cycles in women 45 years and older: the largest single-center cohort to date.

Authors:  Vinay Gunnala; Mohamad Irani; Alexis Melnick; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven Spandorfer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  PGD management scheme for older females with balanced translocations: Do older females have less chance of balanced embryo transfer?

Authors:  Pinar Tulay; Meral Gültomruk; Necati Fındıklı; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Thomas W Geary; Peter J Hansen; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization of human sperm: diagnostics, indications, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Stefan Besada; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Dissecting genomic diversity, one cell at a time.

Authors:  Paul C Blainey; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Birth defects and congenital health risks in children conceived through assisted reproduction technology (ART): a meeting report.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Patricia Diaz-Gimeno; Antonio Pellicer; Nicolas Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.