Literature DB >> 23260613

Thigh pain, subsidence and survival using a short cementless femoral stem with pure metaphyseal fixation at minimum 9-year follow-up.

G Cinotti1, A Della Rocca, P Sessa, F R Ripani, G Giannicola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short femoral stems designed to spare bone stock and improve load transfer at the proximal femur level have been introduced in recent years. However, little is known on the long-term outcomes of these stems. HYPOTHESIS: Short cementless stems have low rate of thigh pain and subsidence as well as few revision needs at mid-term follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 64 patients (72 hips) undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a femoral stem designed to achieve a pure metaphyseal fixation. Patients with hip fracture, femoral neck deformity and osteoporotic bone were excluded. Clinical evaluations were performed annually until the last follow-up, a minimum of 9 years after surgery. At each follow-up, implant positioning was assessed on conventional plain films with a computer assisted radiographic evaluation.
RESULTS: The Harris hip score improved from 43 points (range 19-50) before surgery to 88 points (range 73-100) at the final follow-up (P=0.001), and the Womac score averaged 47 points (range 35-56 points) preoperatively and 76 points (range 63-84) at the last follow-up (P=0.001). Thigh pain was reported by five patients (8%) at the 2-year follow-up, but only in two (3%) was still present, and related to the prosthesis, at last follow-up. Computer assisted radiographic analysis showed a neutral alignment of the stem in 56% of cases, a varus-valgus alignment less than 5° in 36% and equal to 5° in 8%. Stem subsidence was observed in 12 hips but was less than 4mm in all cases (range 0-3mm). Calcar height remained unchanged over time. Adaptive bone remodelling, including proximal bone resorption and distal cortical hypertrophy were not observed at follow-up. No patients had aseptic loosening of the stem nor were radiolucent lines detectable at the level of the porous coating. Survivorship analysis showed a 100% survival rate of the stem at nine years. DISCUSSION: This study showed that a femoral stem designed to achieve a pure metaphyseal fixation may obtain, in a selected group of patients with adequate bone quality, satisfactory clinical outcomes without compromising implant stability. The limited periprosthetic bone remodelling observed after a minimum of 9 years follow-up suggests that this type of implant may improve mechanical stresses on host bone compared with standard stems requiring diaphyseal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Historical series.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23260613     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  16 in total

1.  Comment on Langlois et al.: Charnley-Kerboull total hip arthroplasty combining zirconia on polyethylene. A minimum eight-year follow-up prospective study.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is there any difference between tapered titanium stems with similar geometry and hydroxyapatite coating?

Authors:  G Cinotti; G Mazzotta; F Romana Ripani; G La Torre; G Giannicola
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-01-08

3.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparing return to sport activities after short metaphyseal femoral arthroplasty with resurfacing and big femoral head arthroplasties.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; Eustratios G Papadelis; John A Vlamis; Hlias Basiliadis; Spiros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-03

5.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty with anatomic-shaped implants. Does the minimal invasive anterolateral technique influence the stem position or subsidence in contrast to the standard lateral approach?

Authors:  Nils Wirries; Marcus Örgel; Michael Schwarze; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen; Michael Skutek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shao-Chuan Huo; Fan Wang; Lu-Jue Dong; Wei Wei; Jing-Qi Zeng; Hong-Xing Huang; Qing-Min Han; Rui-Qi Duan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Cementless Stem for Femoral Neck Fractures in a Patient's 10th Decade of Life: High Rate of Periprosthetic Fractures.

Authors:  Method Kabelitz; Yannick Fritz; Patrick Grueninger; Christoph Meier; Patrick Fries; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-29

8.  Periprosthetic stress fracture around a well-fixed type 2B short uncemented stem.

Authors:  Pablo Ariel Slullitel; Jose Ignacio Oñativia; Lionel Llano; Fernando Comba; Gerardo Zanotti; Francisco Piccaluga; Martin Alejandro Buttaro
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-07-30

9.  Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Georgios Gkagkalis; Patrick Goetti; Sabine Mai; Ingmar Meinecke; Näder Helmy; Dominique Bosson; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Liang; Wei-Yi Yang; Jian-Ke Pan; He-Tao Huang; Ming-Hui Luo; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.