BACKGROUND: Variations of genes encoding cytochrome enzymes, drug transporters, and paraoxonase have recently been reported to be associated with clopidogrel response variability besides the well-known CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. We determined whether newly reported genetic variations are associated with clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) in Korean patients. METHODS: OPR was measured in 1264 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using the VerifyNowP2Y12 assay system and genotyping of PON-1 Q192R, ABCB1 C3435T, CYP1A2*1F, CYP2B6*6, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*17, CYP3A4 (IVS10+12G>A), and CYP3A5*3 was performed. We applied two different cutoffs, i.e. 240 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and 253 PRU, to define high OPR. RESULTS: Mean OPR of the entire population was 231±83 PRU. Genetic variations of ABCB1 and PON-1 genes as well as that of CYP1A2, 2B6, 3A4, and 3A5 were not associated with clopidogrel response variability. As for CYP2C19, patients were classified into 4 metabolism genotypes: 0.6% ultrarapid (UM), 40.3% extensive (EM), 48.8% intermediate (IM), and 10.3% poor metabolizers (PM). After adjustment for possible confounders, CYP2C19 metabolism genotype was associated with a significant increase in OPR: effect on OPR-difference: +27 PRU, p=0.015 for EM, +53 PRU, p<0.001 for IM, and +74 PRU, p=0.006 for PM compared with UM. In multivariable analysis, the CYP2C19 genotype was the only independent predictor of high-OPR among genetic variations using two different cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Among genes postulated to be involved in clopidogrel metabolism, only the CYP2C19 genotype is associated with response variability and emerged as an independent predictor of high-OPR using two different cutoffs. PON-1 and ABCB1 genetic variants do not affect clopidogrel OPR in Korean patients.
BACKGROUND: Variations of genes encoding cytochrome enzymes, drug transporters, and paraoxonase have recently been reported to be associated with clopidogrel response variability besides the well-known CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. We determined whether newly reported genetic variations are associated with clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) in Korean patients. METHODS: OPR was measured in 1264 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using the VerifyNowP2Y12 assay system and genotyping of PON-1Q192R, ABCB1C3435T, CYP1A2*1F, CYP2B6*6, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*17, CYP3A4 (IVS10+12G>A), and CYP3A5*3 was performed. We applied two different cutoffs, i.e. 240 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and 253 PRU, to define high OPR. RESULTS: Mean OPR of the entire population was 231±83 PRU. Genetic variations of ABCB1 and PON-1 genes as well as that of CYP1A2, 2B6, 3A4, and 3A5 were not associated with clopidogrel response variability. As for CYP2C19, patients were classified into 4 metabolism genotypes: 0.6% ultrarapid (UM), 40.3% extensive (EM), 48.8% intermediate (IM), and 10.3% poor metabolizers (PM). After adjustment for possible confounders, CYP2C19 metabolism genotype was associated with a significant increase in OPR: effect on OPR-difference: +27 PRU, p=0.015 for EM, +53 PRU, p<0.001 for IM, and +74 PRU, p=0.006 for PM compared with UM. In multivariable analysis, the CYP2C19 genotype was the only independent predictor of high-OPR among genetic variations using two different cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Among genes postulated to be involved in clopidogrel metabolism, only the CYP2C19 genotype is associated with response variability and emerged as an independent predictor of high-OPR using two different cutoffs. PON-1 and ABCB1 genetic variants do not affect clopidogrel OPR in Korean patients.
Authors: Joshua P Lewis; Joshua D Backman; Jean-Luc Reny; Thomas O Bergmeijer; Braxton D Mitchell; Marylyn D Ritchie; Jean-Pierre Déry; Ruth E Pakyz; Li Gong; Kathleen Ryan; Eun-Young Kim; Daniel Aradi; Israel Fernandez-Cadenas; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Ryan M Whaley; Joan Montaner; Gian Franco Gensini; John H Cleator; Kiyuk Chang; Lene Holmvang; Willibald Hochholzer; Dan M Roden; Stefan Winter; Russ B Altman; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Ho-Sook Kim; Meinrad Gawaz; Kevin P Bliden; Marco Valgimigli; Rossella Marcucci; Gianluca Campo; Elke Schaeffeler; Nadia P Dridi; Ming-Shien Wen; Jae Gook Shin; Pierre Fontana; Betti Giusti; Tobias Geisler; Michiaki Kubo; Dietmar Trenk; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Jurriën M Ten Berg; Paul A Gurbel; Matthias Schwab; Teri E Klein; Alan R Shuldiner Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: María Henar García-Lagunar; Luciano Consuegra-Sánchez; Pablo Conesa-Zamora; Javier Ruiz-Cosano; Federico Soria-Arcos; Luis García de Guadiana; Pedro Cano Vivar; Juan Antonio Castillo-Moreno; Antonio Melgarejo-Moreno Journal: Anatol J Cardiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: Arwa M Amin; Lim Sheau Chin; Dzul Azri Mohamed Noor; Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul Kader; Yuen Kah Hay; Baharudin Ibrahim Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Dorota Danielak; Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada; Karolina Wiśniewska; Piotr Bergus; Paweł Burchardt; Anna Komosa; Franciszek Główka Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: Ángel Tito Alvarado; Ana María Muñoz; Berta Loja; Jessica Michiko Miyasato; Jorge Antonio García; Roberto Andrés Cerro; Luis Abel Quiñones; Nelson Miguel Varela Journal: Biomedica Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 0.935