Literature DB >> 23260055

Limitations of time-resolved fluorescence suggested by molecular simulations: assessing the dynamics of T cell receptor binding loops.

Daniel R Scott1, Charles F Vardeman, Steven A Corcelli, Brian M Baker.   

Abstract

Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy (TRFA) has a rich history in evaluating protein dynamics. Yet as often employed, TRFA assumes that the motional properties of a covalently tethered fluorescent probe accurately portray the motional properties of the protein backbone at the probe attachment site. In an extensive survey using TRFA to study the dynamics of the binding loops of a αβ T cell receptor, we observed multiple discrepancies between the TRFA data and previously published results that led us to question this assumption. We thus simulated several of the experimentally probed systems using a protocol that permitted accurate determination of probe and protein time correlation functions. We found excellent agreement in the decays of the experimental and simulated correlation functions. However, the motional properties of the probe were poorly correlated with those of the backbone of both the labeled and unlabeled protein. Our results warrant caution in the interpretation of TRFA data and suggest further studies to ascertain the extent to which probe dynamics reflect those of the protein backbone. Meanwhile, the agreement between experiment and computation validates the use of molecular dynamics simulations as an accurate tool for exploring the molecular motion of T cell receptors and their binding loops.
Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23260055      PMCID: PMC3525847          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  23 in total

1.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical.

Authors:  Y H Ding; B M Baker; D N Garboczi; W E Biddison; D C Wiley
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  Two different T cell receptors use different thermodynamic strategies to recognize the same peptide/MHC ligand.

Authors:  Rebecca L Davis-Harrison; Kathryn M Armstrong; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Simulation of fluorescence anisotropy experiments: probing protein dynamics.

Authors:  Gunnar F Schröder; Ulrike Alexiev; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

Authors:  David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Structural dynamics of the alpha-neurotoxin-acetylcholine-binding protein complex: hydrodynamic and fluorescence anisotropy decay analyses.

Authors:  Ryan E Hibbs; David A Johnson; Jianxin Shi; Scott B Hansen; Palmer Taylor
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2.

Authors:  D N Garboczi; P Ghosh; U Utz; Q R Fan; W E Biddison; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Activation and molecular recognition of the GPCR rhodopsin--insights from time-resolved fluorescence depolarisation and single molecule experiments.

Authors:  Tai-Yang Kim; Thomas Schlieter; Sebastian Haase; Ulrike Alexiev
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  T cell receptor recognition via cooperative conformational plasticity.

Authors:  Susan J Gagnon; Oleg Y Borbulevych; Rebecca L Davis-Harrison; Richard V Turner; Marale Damirjian; Alison Wojnarowicz; William E Biddison; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Nanosecond dynamics of acetylcholinesterase near the active center gorge.

Authors:  Aileen E Boyd; Cristina S Dunlop; Lilly Wong; Zoran Radic; Palmer Taylor; David A Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Nanosecond dynamics of the mouse acetylcholinesterase cys69-cys96 omega loop.

Authors:  Jianxin Shi; Kaihsu Tai; J Andrew McCammon; Palmer Taylor; David A Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamics of nuclear receptor Helix-12 switch of transcription activation by modeling time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decays.

Authors:  Mariana R B Batista; Leandro Martínez
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A generalized framework for computational design and mutational scanning of T-cell receptor binding interfaces.

Authors:  Timothy P Riley; Cory M Ayres; Lance M Hellman; Nishant K Singh; Michael Cosiano; Jennifer M Cimons; Michael J Anderson; Kurt H Piepenbrink; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  Nanosecond Dynamics of Gαi1 Bound to Nucleotides or Ric-8A, a Gα Chaperone with GEF Activity.

Authors:  Labe A Black; Celestine J Thomas; Gwendolyn N Nix; Michelle C Terwilliger; Stephen R Sprang; J B Alexander Ross
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  TCR scanning of peptide/MHC through complementary matching of receptor and ligand molecular flexibility.

Authors:  William F Hawse; Soumya De; Alex I Greenwood; Linda K Nicholson; Jaroslav Zajicek; Evgenii L Kovrigin; David M Kranz; K Christopher Garcia; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Peptide and Peptide-Dependent Motions in MHC Proteins: Immunological Implications and Biophysical Underpinnings.

Authors:  Cory M Ayres; Steven A Corcelli; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Differential utilization of binding loop flexibility in T cell receptor ligand selection and cross-reactivity.

Authors:  Cory M Ayres; Daniel R Scott; Steven A Corcelli; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In Silico and Structural Analyses Demonstrate That Intrinsic Protein Motions Guide T Cell Receptor Complementarity Determining Region Loop Flexibility.

Authors:  Christopher J Holland; Bruce J MacLachlan; Valentina Bianchi; Sophie J Hesketh; Richard Morgan; Owen Vickery; Anna M Bulek; Anna Fuller; Andrew Godkin; Andrew K Sewell; Pierre J Rizkallah; Stephen Wells; David K Cole
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  T-Cell Receptor CDR3 Loop Conformations in Solution Shift the Relative Vα-Vβ Domain Distributions.

Authors:  Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Nancy D Pomarici; Johannes R Loeffler; Clarissa A Seidler; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  The Hypervariable Loops of Free TCRs Sample Multiple Distinct Metastable Conformations in Solution.

Authors:  James E Crooks; Christopher T Boughter; L Ridgway Scott; Erin J Adams
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-11-13

10.  T cell receptor interactions with human leukocyte antigen govern indirect peptide selectivity for the cancer testis antigen MAGE-A4.

Authors:  Charlotte H Coles; Catriona McMurran; Angharad Lloyd; Miriam Hock; Linda Hibbert; Marine C C Raman; Conor Hayes; Patrick Lupardus; David K Cole; Stephen Harper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.