Literature DB >> 23258271

Low prevalence of hypopituitarism after subarachnoid haemorrhage using confirmatory testing and with BMI-specific GH cut-off levels.

Chris J Gardner1, Mohsen Javadpour, Catherine Stoneley, Mani Purthuran, Shubhabrata Biswas, Christina Daousi, Ian A MacFarlane, Daniel J Cuthbertson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hypopituitarism following subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has been reported to be a frequent occurrence. However, there is considerable heterogeneity between studies with differing patient populations and treatment modalities and most importantly employing differing endocrine protocols and (normal) reference ranges of GH. We aimed to examine prospectively a cohort of SAH survivors for development of hypopituitarism post-SAH using rigorous endocrine testing and compare GH response to glucagon stimulation with a cohort of healthy controls of a similar BMI. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were investigated for evidence of hypopituitarism 3 months post-SAH with 50 patients tested again at 12 months. Glucagon stimulation testing (GST), with confirmation of deficiencies by GHRH/arginine testing for GH deficiency (GHD) and short synacthen testing for ACTH deficiency, was used. Basal testing of other hormonal axes was undertaken.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 53±11.7 years and mean BMI was 27.5±5.7 kg/m(2). After confirmatory testing, the prevalence of hypopituitarism was 12% (GHD 10%, asymptomatic hypocortisolaemia 2%). There was no association between hypopituitarism and post-SAH vasospasm, presence of cerebral infarction, Fisher grade, or clinical grading at presentation. There was a significant correlation between BMI and peak GH to glucagon stimulation in both patients and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Identification of 'true' GHD after SAH requires confirmatory testing with an alternative stimulation test and application of BMI-specific cut-offs. Using such stringent criteria, we found a prevalence of hypopituitarism of 12% in our population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23258271     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-12-0849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  6 in total

1.  Pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: course and clinical predictors—the HIPS study.

Authors:  L Khajeh; K Blijdorp; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; E M Sneekes; H J G van den Berg-Emons; A J van der Lely; D W J Dippel; S J C M M Neggers; G M Ribbers; F van Kooten
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Hypopituitarism after subarachnoid haemorrhage, do we know enough?

Authors:  Ladbon Khajeh; Karin Blijdorp; Sebastian Jcmm Neggers; Gerard M Ribbers; Diederik Wj Dippel; Fop van Kooten
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  The prevalence of growth hormone deficiency in survivors of subarachnoid haemorrhage: results from a large single centre study.

Authors:  Sumithra Giritharan; Joanna Cox; Calvin J Heal; David Hughes; Kanna Gnanalingham; Tara Kearney
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Hypopituitarism in Traumatic Brain Injury-A Critical Note.

Authors:  Marianne Klose; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Diagnostic value of a ghrelin test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  K Blijdorp; L Khajeh; G M Ribbers; E M Sneekes; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; H J G van den Berg-Emons; A J van der Lely; F van Kooten; S J C M M Neggers
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.664

6.  Pituitary function within the first year after traumatic brain injury or subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  A Tölli; J Borg; B-M Bellander; F Johansson; C Höybye
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.256

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.