| Literature DB >> 23257912 |
Mamoru Oshiki1, Motoharu Onuki, Hiroyasu Satoh, Takashi Mino.
Abstract
The removal of biodegradable organic matter is one of the most important objectives in biological wastewater treatments. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-accumulating organisms (PHAAOs) significantly contribute to the removal of biodegradable organic matter; however, their microbial community composition is mostly unknown. In the present study, the microbial community composition of PHAAOs was investigated at 8 full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), operated in fully aerobic mode, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and post-FISH Nile blue A (NBA) staining techniques. Our results demonstrated that 1) PHAAOs were in the range of 11-18% in the total number of cells, and 2) the microbial community composition of PHAAOs was similar at the bacterial domain/phylum/class/order level among the 8 full-scale WWTPs, and dominant PHAAOs were members of the class Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. The microbial community composition of α- and β-proteobacterial PHAAOs was examined by 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis and further by applying a set of newly designed oligonucleotide probes targeting 16S rRNA gene sequences of α- or β-proteobacterial PHAAOs. The results demonstrated that the microbial community composition of PHAAOs differed in the class Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, which possibly resulted in a different PHA accumulation capacity among the WWTPs (8.5-38.2 mg-C g-VSS(-1) h(-1)). The present study extended the knowledge of the microbial diversity of PHAAOs in full-scale WWTPs operated in fully aerobic mode.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23257912 PMCID: PMC4070681 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me12141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Oligonucleotide probes used in the study. Phylogenetic affiliations of the OTUs defined in the study are shown in Fig. 2.
| Probe name | Specificity | Sequence (5′-3′) | FA | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUB338 | Most Bacteria | GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT | 35% | ( |
| EUB338-II | GCAGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | 35% | ( | |
| EUB338-III | GCTGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | 35% | ( | |
| ALF968 | GGTAAGGTTCTGCGCGTT | 20% | ( | |
| BET42ae | GCCTTCCCACTTCGTTT | 35% | ( | |
| GAM42ae | GCCTTCCCACATCGTTT | 35% | ( | |
| HGC69a | TATAGTTACCACCGCCGT | 35% | ( | |
| LGC354A | TGGAAGATTCCCTACTGC | 35% | ( | |
| LGC354B | CGGAAGATTCCCTACTGC | 35% | ( | |
| LGC354C | CCGAAGATTCCCTACTGC | 35% | ( | |
| CF319a | TGGTCCGTGTCTCAGTAC | 35% | ( | |
| CFX1223 | CCATTGTAGCGTGTGTGTMG | 35% | ( | |
| ARR994 | OTU-1, 2, 3 | GGTCCCGCGATACCCATG | 40% | This study |
| Comp994 | GGCCCCGCGATACCCATG | This study | ||
| ARP653 | OTU-4, 5, 6 | CTCACCTCTCTCGAACTC | 50% | This study |
| Comp653 | CTCACCTCTCTCGACCTC | This study | ||
| ABJ1302 | OTU-7 | GTTGCAGAGCCCAATCCG | 30% | This study |
| AHS576 | OTU-8 | ACAAATCCGCCTACGTGC | 55% | This study |
| Comp576 | ATAAATCCGCCTACGTGC | This study | ||
| DEN441 | OTU-9, 10, 11, 12 | TGCGATTTCTTCCCGGCC | 40% | ( |
| PAO846 | OTU-13, 14 | GTTAGCTACGGCACTAAAAGG | 35% | ( |
| BRDA454 | OTU-15 | CCCCGTATTAGGAGATGCG | 10% | This study |
| ZOO834 | OTU-16 | CTCAATGAGTCTCCTCACCG | 50% | ( |
| OTU1-427 | OTU-17 | CCCGGACTAAAGCGGTTTAC | 30% | ( |
| OTU1-472 | OTU-17 | TCCAGTACCATCAAAGCACG | 30% | ( |
| BCC1212 | OTU-18 | GTTTCTAGCCCCACCTAT | 40% | This study |
| BCO395e | OTU-19, 20, 21 | TTCATCCTGCACGCGGAATG | 30% | This study |
| Comp395 | TTCATCCTGCACGCGGCATG | This study | ||
| BCAD1422 | OTU-22, 23 | ACCCACTTCTGGCGAGAC | 30% | This study |
| BCAT1010 | OTU-24, 25 | CGAGCACTCCTCTATCTCTA | 30% | This study |
| Comp1010 | CGAGCACCCCTCTATCTCTA | This study | ||
| BCR622 | OTU-26 | GTCAGTACAGGTCCAGGGGA | 40% | This study |
| BCI823 | OTU-27 | AACCCCTCCAACAACCAGTT | 10% | This study |
Used in an equimolar, EUB mix,
Used in an equimolar, LGC mix,
Used in an equimolar, OTU1 mix,
Used in combination with their corresponding unlabeled competitor probes
PHA accumulation rates and conversion rates of acetate into PHA. Activated sludge samples were aerobically incubated with the addition of 100 mg-C l−1 acetate. After 6 h of incubation, the acetate and PHA concentrations were determined by ion chromatography and gas chromatography, respectively. PHA conversion ratio was calculated by dividing the amount of accumulated PHA by the amount of consumed acetate
| Activated sludge sample | PHA accumulation rate (mg-C g-VSS−1 h−1) | PHA conversion ratio (mg-C mg-C−1 × 100) |
|---|---|---|
| AS-A | 8.5 | 39% |
| AS-B | 10.9 | 29% |
| AS-C | 11.5 | 41% |
| AS-D | 11.6 | 35% |
| AS-E | 19.7 | 49% |
| AS-F | 20.1 | 40% |
| AS-G | 25.3 | 45% |
| AS-H | 38.2 | 64% |
Fig. 1Micrographs taken after dual staining with DAPI and NBA. A) DAPI image, B) NBA image. The activated sludge sample accumulating PHA was stained with DAPI and NBA, and then examined by microscopy. Images A) and B) were taken at the same location. The following three particle types were found in these images and their examples are indicated by arrows: i) particles detected with only DAPI (arrows with a closed circle symbol at the end); ii) particles detected with DAPI and NBA (arrows without any symbol at the end); and iii) particles detected with only NBA (arrows with a closed square at the end). Bar=10 μm.
Abundance of PHAAOs in activated sludge samples. Activated sludge samples were stained with NBA and DAPI, and then examined by microscopy to enumerate the abundance of PHAAOs in the total number of cells. Errors indicate the range of s.d. derived from 10 randomly captured images
| Activated sludge sample | PHAAOs/Total cells |
|---|---|
| AS-A | 15 ± 5% |
| AS-B | 13 ± 3% |
| AS-C | 12 ± 3% |
| AS-D | 11 ± 2% |
| AS-E | 13 ± 2% |
| AS-F | 18 ± 5% |
| AS-G | 16 ± 2% |
| AS-H | 14 ± 3% |
Microbial community composition of PHAAOs in the 8 full-scale WWTPs. Activated sludge samples were examined by FISH with the oligonucleotide probes described in Table 1 and post-FISH NBA staining analysis. Abundance of individual PHAAOs refers to the entire population of PHAAOs. n.d.: not detected
| Target | Activated sludge sample | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| AS-A | AS-B | AS-C | AS-D | AS-E | AS-F | AS-G | AS-H | |
| >95% | 89 ± 14% | 88 ± 11% | >95% | >95% | >95% | >95% | 80 ± 8% | |
| 14 ± 4% | 13 ± 5% | 17 ± 7% | 27 ± 8% | 15 ± 8% | 18 ± 7% | 30 ± 14% | 40 ± 9% | |
| OTU-1, 2, 3 | <1% | <1% | — | — | n.d. | — | <1% | — |
| OTU-4, 5, 6 | n.d. | <1% | — | — | 2 ± 1% | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-7 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-8 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| 70 ± 6% | 56 ± 12% | 64 ± 14% | 83 ± 13% | 74 ± 14% | 71 ± 15% | 60 ± 16% | 53 ± 10% | |
| OTU-9, 10, 11, 12 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-13, 14 | n.d. | <1% | — | — | 9 ± 7% | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-15 | n.d. | 2 ± 1% | — | — | 15 ± 6% | — | 3 ± 2% | — |
| OTU-16 | 5 ± 3% | 4 ± 3% | — | — | 7 ± 2% | — | 3 ± 2% | — |
| OTU-17 | 8 ± 3% | 4 ± 2% | — | — | 2 ± 1% | — | <1% | — |
| OTU-18 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-19, 20, 21 | 5 ± 4% | 7 ± 4% | — | — | 13 ± 6% | — | 4 ± 2% | — |
| OTU-22, 23 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-24, 25 | n.d. | 5 ± 3% | — | — | 4 ± 2% | — | <1% | — |
| OTU-26 | 16 ± 5% | <1% | — | — | <1% | — | n.d. | — |
| OTU-27 | n.d. | n.d. | — | — | n.d. | — | n.d. | — |
| 3 ± 2% | 4 ± 2% | 2 ±1% | 4 ± 2% | 3 ± 1% | <1% | 6 ± 2% | 5 ± 2% | |
| 3 ± 1% | 5 ± 3% | <1% | 2 ± 1% | 3 ± 1% | n.d. | 5 ± 2% | <1% | |
| n.d. | n.d. | <1% | 2 ± 2% | 2 ± 2% | n.d. | <1% | n.d. | |
| n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2 ± 1% | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | |
| n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | |
Hybridized with the EUB mix probe
Fig. 2Maximum-parsimony tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree indicates the phylogenetic affiliation of OTUs in the class Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria and their closest proteobacteria relatives. Nearly full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences of the representative clones in each OTUs were determined and aligned with their relatives in the SILVA database by the tool Integrated Aligners in ARB software. The phylogenetic tree was calculated by the maximum parsimony (Phylip DNAPARS), neighbor-joining (Jukes-Cantor model) or maximum likelihood (RAxMX) methods, and the phylogenetic tree calculated with the maximum parsimony method is shown here. Pie charts at the nodes represent the confidence of branch topology, and bootstrap values greater than 90% are in black (neighbor-joining method, NJ, for the upper sector; maximum parsimony method, MP, for the bottom-left sector; maximum likelihood method, ML, for the bottom-right sector). Scale bar represents 0.10 substitutions per nucleotide position.