Literature DB >> 23256770

Crystallite width determines monolayer hydration across a wide spectrum of celluloses isolated from plants.

Carlos Driemeier1, Juliano Bragatto.   

Abstract

Relating cellulose structure to its water uptake is a classical problem with many investigations done through measurements of cellulose "crystallinity". However, there is presently a growing consensus that crystallinity measurements are appreciably uncertain, leading to ambiguous interpretations of underlying cellulose organization. In this scenario, this article revisits the relations between cellulose structure and water uptake, moving the emphasis away from degree of crystallinity and directing it toward crystallite width, which is inferred with less ambiguity from the broadening of 200 X-ray diffraction peaks. With this approach, analysis of a wide spectrum of celluloses isolated from plants (preserving cellulose I phase and having variable contents of residual hemicelluloses) reveals a simple linear relation (R(2) = 0.98) between reciprocal crystallite width and monolayer hydration (determined from vapor sorption). The primary role of crystallite width supports that most water-accessible polysaccharides are laterally associated with the crystallites, with a minor fraction in disordered domains along the fibrils. Furthermore, the secondary role left to hemicellulosic contents indicates cellulose being partly decrystallized to complement the disordered amount required to interface the crystallites. Finally, a substantial part of hydration is attributed to polysaccharides in voids left by the imperfect packing of aggregated crystallites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23256770     DOI: 10.1021/jp309948h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  2 in total

1.  Network of proteins, enzymes and genes linked to biomass degradation shared by Trichoderma species.

Authors:  Maria Augusta Crivelente Horta; Jaire Alves Ferreira Filho; Natália Faraj Murad; Eidy de Oliveira Santos; Clelton Aparecido Dos Santos; Juliano Sales Mendes; Marcelo Mendes Brandão; Sindelia Freitas Azzoni; Anete Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films.

Authors:  David Reishofer; Roland Resel; Jürgen Sattelkow; Wolfgang J Fischer; Katrin Niegelhell; Tamilselvan Mohan; Karin Stana Kleinschek; Heinz Amenitsch; Harald Plank; Tekla Tammelin; Eero Kontturi; Stefan Spirk
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.