Literature DB >> 23255956

Comparison of distribution characteristics of metastatic bone lesions between breast and prostate carcinomas.

Chang-Yin Wang1, Guang-Yao Wu, Mei-Juan Shen, Kun-Wei Cui, Ying Shen.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the distribution characteristics of bone metastases in breast and prostate carcinomas. Bone scintigraphies were performed in 504 cancer patients. We studied the correlation between the distribution and total number of metastatic bone lesions, and compared the distribution of metastatic bone lesions between breast and prostate carcinomas. In the early stage, the distribution in the thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae and pelvis of the metastatic lesions of the prostate carcinoma (81.0%, 47/58) was significantly higher than that of the breast carcinoma (41.7%, 63/151; χ(2)=27.6, P=0.000). The distribution of the lesions in the thoracic skeleton in the cases of the breast carcinoma (65.6%, 99/151) was significantly higher than that of the prostate carcinoma (27.6%, 16/58; χ(2)=24.8, P=0.000); however, the distributions in the advanced cases were not markedly different. The differences in the proportions of the metastatic lesions in the lumbar vertebrae (χ(2)=56.1, P=0.000) and ribs (χ(2)=39.1, P=0.000) in the cases of the prostate carcinoma, and in the sternum (χ(2)=31.2, P=0.000), skull (χ(2)=26.5, P=0.000) and femur (χ(2)=13.6, P=0.001) in the cases of the breast carcinoma were significant. Between the breast and prostate carcinomas, the differences in the proportions of the metastatic lesions of certain bones were also significant. In cases with few bone metastases, the proportion of sternum metastases of patients with breast carcinoma (17.9%) was significantly higher than that of patients with prostate carcinoma (1.7%; χ(2)=12.7, P=0.000); the proportion of metastases in the lumbar vertebrae of prostate carcinoma (39.7%) was significantly higher than that of breast carcinoma (13.9%; χ(2)=15.4, P=0.000); the proportion of rib metastases of breast carcinoma (27.2%) was significantly higher than that of prostate carcinoma (8.6%; χ(2)=9.6, P=0.002). In cases with extensive bone metastases, the proportions of metastatic lesions in the sternum and lumbar vertebrae in breast and prostate carcinomas were not significantly different (P>0.05). In conclusion, the distribution of bone metastases is correlated with the total number of metastatic bone lesions in breast and prostate carcinoma patients, and has different characteristics in different lesions.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23255956      PMCID: PMC3525489          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.1005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  16 in total

1.  [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elena Giulia Spinapolice; Federico Fallanca; Cinzia Crivellaro; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luigi Gianolli; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Comparison of bone scan with carbohydrate antigen 15-3 for evaluation of bone metastasis of brest cancer.

Authors:  M Mohammadzadeh; H Alikhah; A G A Zareh
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-15

4.  Correlation of neoplasms with incidence and localization of skeletal metastases: An analysis of 1,355 diphosphonate bone scans.

Authors:  A J Tofe; M D Francis; W J Harvey
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Bone scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer: malignant involvement of the sternum.

Authors:  E Ohtake; H Murata; H Maruno
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

6.  Accuracy of 99mTC-diphosphonate bone scans and roentgenograms in the detection of prostate, breast and lung carcinoma metastases.

Authors:  J D Osmond; H P Pendergrass; M S Potsaid
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1975-12

7.  The value of a baseline bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Lin; Z Szabo; B B Chin; A C Civelek
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 8.  Current role of bone scan with phosphonates in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Maffioli; Luigia Florimonte; Luca Pagani; Ivana Butti; Isabel Roca
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  The distribution of skeletal metastases in breast and pulmonary cancer: concise communication.

Authors:  M A Wilson; F W Calhoun
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Association between number and sites of new bone scan abnormalities and presence of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Jacobson; P C Stomper; M S Jochelson; D M Ascoli; I C Henderson; W D Kaplan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  10 in total

1.  Metastatic dissemination patterns of different primary tumors to the spine and other bones.

Authors:  Julia S Onken; Lucius S Fekonja; Romy Wehowsky; Vanessa Hubertus; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Targeting bone metastases in prostate cancer: improving clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Body; Sandra Casimiro; Luís Costa
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Denosumab treatment in the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: clinical evidence and experience.

Authors:  Miriam Hegemann; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-02-06

Review 4.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Fractionated external beam radiotherapy of skull base metastases with cranial nerve involvement.

Authors:  L H Dröge; T Hinsche; M Canis; B Alt-Epping; C F Hess; H A Wolff
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Current concepts and trends in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Hegemann; Moritz Maas; Steffen Rausch; Simon Walz; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Where Do Bone-Targeted Agents RANK in Breast Cancer Treatment?

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Ian Haynes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Clinical characteristics and risk factors for developing bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Zhao Chen; Jun-Feng Shen; Yang Zhou; Xuan-Yin Chen; Jia-Ming Liu; Zhi-Li Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Hedgehog Signaling for Urogenital Organogenesis and Prostate Cancer: An Implication for the Epithelial-Mesenchyme Interaction (EMI).

Authors:  Taiju Hyuga; Mellissa Alcantara; Daiki Kajioka; Ryuma Haraguchi; Kentaro Suzuki; Shinichi Miyagawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Yutaro Hayashi; Gen Yamada
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Targeting Intercellular Communication in the Bone Microenvironment to Prevent Disseminated Tumor Cell Escape from Dormancy and Bone Metastatic Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Lauren M Kreps; Christina L Addison
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.