Literature DB >> 2325523

Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled.

D J Mazur1, D H Hickam.   

Abstract

The presentation of efficacy data influences preferences for treatment options. To determine how the amount of data provided to patients influenced patient decision making after framing and labeling effects were controlled, patients and physicians were presented results of two alternative treatments for an unidentified serious medical condition, derived from summary data of lung cancer treatment after surgery (better long-term survival) or radiation therapy (better short-term survival). These data are the same as used in previous studies of framing. When summary data at one month, one year, and five years were presented in terms of both survival and mortality, patients preferred the option that would be expected if only mortality data had been presented. When more detailed data were presented (data at six discrete time points), both patients and physicians preferred the option associated with a survival frame influence in previous studies. Thus, once framing influences are controlled, preference changes can be influenced by another attribute of summary data: the amount of data presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2325523     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  7 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Using survival curve comparisons to inform patient decision making can a practice exercise improve understanding?

Authors:  K Armstrong; G FitzGerald; J S Schwartz; P A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Decision-making in Orthopaedic Oncology: Does Cognitive Bias Affect a Virtual Patient's Choice Between Limb Salvage and Amputation?

Authors:  Richard W Gurich; Amy M Cizik; Stephanie E Punt; Michael Namekata; Christopher N Johnson; Rebecca G Symons; Elena G Brewer; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

7.  Health care sought and received by men with urinary symptoms, and their views on prostatectomy.

Authors:  D J Hunter; C M McKee; N A Black; C F Sanderson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.