Literature DB >> 23254546

Influence of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the lower-body power profile.

Maria L Nibali1, Dale W Chapman, Robert A Robergs, Eric J Drinkwater.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of evidence-based support for the allocation of rest interval duration between incremental loads in the assessment of the load-power profile. We examined the effect of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the load-power profile and sought to determine if greater rest is required with increasing load (i.e., variable rest interval). Ten physically trained men completed 4 experimental conditions in a crossover balanced design. Participants performed jump squats across incremental loads (0-60 kg) on 4 occasions, with an allocated recovery interval of 1, 2, 3, or 4 minutes. The mean log-transformed power output at each load was used for comparison between conditions (rest intervals). Unloaded jump squats (0 kg) maximized power output at each condition. The maximal mechanical power output was 66.6 ± 6.5 W·kg (1 minute), 66.2 ± 5.2 W·kg (2 minutes), 67.1 ± 5.9 W·kg (3 minutes), and 66.2 ± 6.5 W·kg (4 minutes). Trivial or unclear differences in power output were observed between rest intervals at each incremental load. As expected, power declined per 10 kg increment in load, the magnitude of decrease was 13.9-14.5% (confidence limits [CL]: ±1.3-2.0%) and 13.4-14.6% (CL: ±2.4-3.9%) for relative peak and mean power, respectively, yet differences in power output between conditions were likely insubstantial. The prescription of rest intervals between loads that are longer than 1 minute have a likely negligible effect on muscular power production in the jump squat incremental load-power profile. Practitioners should select either a 1- to 4-minute rest interval to best accommodate the logistical constraints of their monitoring sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23254546     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280c6fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

Review 1.  Body mass maximizes power output in human jumping: a strength-independent optimum loading behavior.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric; Goran Markovic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco A Soriano; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Matthew R Rhea; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  How Are Mechanical, Physiological, and Perceptual Variables Affected by the Rest Interval Between Sets During a Flywheel Resistance Session?

Authors:  Rafael Sabido; Jose Luis Hernández-Davó; Laia Capdepon; Julio Tous-Fajardo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.