Literature DB >> 23254489

Effects of resistance training fatigue on joint biomechanics.

David R Hooper1, Tunde K Szivak, Lindsay J Distefano, Brett A Comstock, Courtenay Dunn-Lewis, Jenna M Apicella, Neil A Kelly, Brent C Creighton, Jeff S Volek, Carl M Maresh, William J Kraemer.   

Abstract

Resistance training has been found to have a multitude of benefits. However, when performed with short rest, resistance training can result in substantial fatigue, which may have a negative impact on exercise technique. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of fatigue from resistance exercise on joint biomechanics to determine what residual movement effects may exist after the workout. Twelve men with at least 6 months of resistance training experience (age 24 ± 4.2 years, height 173.1 ± 3.6 cm, weight 76.9 ± 7.8 kg) performed 5 body weight squats before (pretest) and after (posttest) a highly fatiguing resistance training workout. Lower extremity biomechanics were assessed using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system during these squats. Peak angle, total displacement, and rate were assessed for knee flexion, trunk flexion, hip flexion, hip rotation, and hip adduction. Results showed a significant decrease in peak angle for knee flexion (Pre: 120.28 ± 11.93°, Post: 104.46 ± 9.85°), hip flexion (Pre: -109.42 ± 12.49°, Post: -95.8 ± 12.30°), and hip adduction (Pre: -23.32 ± 7.04°, Post: -17.30 ± 8.79°). There was a significant reduction in angular displacement for knee flexion (Pre: 115.56 ± 10.55°, Post: 103.35 ± 10.49°), hip flexion (Pre: 97.94 ± 10.69°, Post: 90.51 ± 13.22°), hip adduction (Pre: 17.79 ± 7.36°, Post: 11.89 ± 4.34°), and hip rotation (Pre: 30.72 ± 12.28, Post: 20.48 ± 10.12). There was also a significant reduction in displacement rate for knee flexion (Pre: 2.20 ± 0.20, Post: 1.98 ± 0.20), hip flexion (Pre: 1.92 ± 0.20, Post: 1.76 ± 0.27), hip adduction (Pre: -0.44 ± 0.17, Post: -0.31 ± 0.17), and hip rotation (Pre: 0.59 ± 0.23, Post: 0.38 ± 0.21). This study demonstrated that there are lasting residual effects on movement capabilities after a high-intensity short rest protocol. Thus, strength and conditioning coaches must be careful to monitor movements and exercise techniques after such workouts to prevent injury and optimize subsequent exercise protocols that might be sequenced in order.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23254489     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825390da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for Resuming PA after Prolonged Rest in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Integrative Review of Relevance for Immunity.

Authors:  Antonio Cicchella
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  CrossFit® Instructor Demographics and Practice Trends.

Authors:  Gregory R Waryasz; Vladimir Suric; Alan H Daniels; Joseph A Gil; Craig P Eberson
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?

Authors:  Scotty J Butcher; Tyler J Neyedly; Karla J Horvey; Chad R Benko
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-07-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.