BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of educational interventions targeted at improving delirium care is limited by implementation barriers. Studying factors which shape learning needs can overcome these knowledge transfer barriers. This in-depth qualitative study explores learning needs of hospital staff relating to care needs of the confused older patients. METHODS: Fifteen research participants from across the healthcare spectrum working within an acute care setting were interviewed. Five focus groups were undertaken with patients, carers, and mental health specialists. A Grounded Theory methodology was adopted and data were analyzed thematically in parallel to collection until theoretical saturation was reached. RESULTS: Eight categories of practice gap emerged: ownership of the confused patient, negative attitudes, lack of understanding of how frightened the patient is in hospital, carer partnerships, person-centered care, communication, recognition of cognitive impairment and specific clinical needs (e.g. capacity assessments). Conceptually, the learning needs were found to be hierarchically related. Moreover, a vicious circle relating to the core learning needs of ownership, attitudes and patient's fear emerged. A patient with delirium may be frightened in an alien environment and then negatively labeled by staff who subsequently wish for their removal, thereby worsening the patient's fear. DISCUSSION: These findings reconceptualize delirium education approaches suggesting a need to focus interventions on core level practice gaps. This fresh perspective on education, away from disease-based delirium knowledge toward work-based patient, team and practice knowledge, could lead to more effective educational strategies to improve delirium care.
BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of educational interventions targeted at improving delirium care is limited by implementation barriers. Studying factors which shape learning needs can overcome these knowledge transfer barriers. This in-depth qualitative study explores learning needs of hospital staff relating to care needs of the confused older patients. METHODS: Fifteen research participants from across the healthcare spectrum working within an acute care setting were interviewed. Five focus groups were undertaken with patients, carers, and mental health specialists. A Grounded Theory methodology was adopted and data were analyzed thematically in parallel to collection until theoretical saturation was reached. RESULTS: Eight categories of practice gap emerged: ownership of the confused patient, negative attitudes, lack of understanding of how frightened the patient is in hospital, carer partnerships, person-centered care, communication, recognition of cognitive impairment and specific clinical needs (e.g. capacity assessments). Conceptually, the learning needs were found to be hierarchically related. Moreover, a vicious circle relating to the core learning needs of ownership, attitudes and patient's fear emerged. A patient with delirium may be frightened in an alien environment and then negatively labeled by staff who subsequently wish for their removal, thereby worsening the patient's fear. DISCUSSION: These findings reconceptualize delirium education approaches suggesting a need to focus interventions on core level practice gaps. This fresh perspective on education, away from disease-based delirium knowledge toward work-based patient, team and practice knowledge, could lead to more effective educational strategies to improve delirium care.
Authors: Song Yuin Lee; James Fisher; Anne P F Wand; Koen Milisen; Elke Detroyer; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Meera Agar; Annmarie Hosie; Andrew Teodorczuk Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Giuseppe Bellelli; Alessandro Morandi; Marco Trabucchi; Guido Caironi; Daniele Coen; Carlo Fraticelli; Ciro Paolillo; Carolina Prevaldi; Angela Riccardi; Gianfranco Cervellin; Corrado Carabellese; Salvatore Putignano; Stefania Maggi; Antonio Cherubini; Paola Gnerre; Andrea Fontanella; Nicola Latronico; Concezione Tommasino; Antonio Corcione; Giovanni Ricevuti; Nicola Ferrara; Francesco De Filippi; Alberto Ferrari; Mario Guarino; Maria Pia Ruggieri; Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Carlo Locatelli; Patrizia Hrelia; Marco Otto Toscano; Emi Bondi; Antonio Tarasconi; Luca Ansaloni; Francesco Perticone Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Rodric Peter Llewelyn Jenkin; Adam Al-Attar; Sarah Richardson; Phyo Kyaw Myint; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Daniel H J Davis Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: James Michael Fisher; Adam Lee Gordon; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Ellen Tullo; Daniel H J Davis; Adrian Blundell; Robert H Field; Andrew Teodorczuk Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jo Ellen Wilson; Matthew F Mart; Colm Cunningham; Yahya Shehabi; Timothy D Girard; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Arjen J C Slooter; E Wesley Ely Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Elke Detroyer; Fabienne Dobbels; Deborah Debonnaire; Kate Irving; Andrew Teodorczuk; Donna M Fick; Etienne Joosten; Koen Milisen Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 2.463