Literature DB >> 23253307

Disparities in access to hospitals with robotic surgery for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Simon P Kim1, Stephen A Boorjian, Nilay D Shah, Christopher J Weight, Jon C Tilburt, Leona C Han, R Houston Thompson, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Maxine Sun, James P Moriarty, R Jeffrey Karnes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We described population level trends in radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer by hospitals with robotic surgery, and assessed whether socioeconomic disparities exist in access to such hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After merging the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) and the AHA (American Hospital Association) survey from 2006 to 2008, we identified 29,837 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was treatment with radical prostatectomy at hospitals that have adopted robotic surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with radical prostatectomy performed at hospitals with robotic surgery.
RESULTS: Overall 20,424 (68.5%) patients were surgically treated with radical prostatectomy at hospitals with robotic surgery, while 9,413 (31.5%) underwent radical prostatectomy at hospitals without robotic surgery. There was a marked increase in radical prostatectomy at hospital adopters from 55.8% in 2006 and 70.7% in 2007 to 76.1% in 2008 (p <0.001 for trend). After adjusting for patient and hospital features, lower odds of undergoing radical prostatectomy at hospitals with robotic surgery were seen in black patients (OR 0.81, p <0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.77, p <0.001) vs white patients. Compared to having private health insurance, being primarily insured with Medicaid (OR 0.70, p <0.001) was also associated with lower odds of being treated at hospitals with robotic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a rapid shift of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to hospitals with robotic surgery from 2006 to 2008, black and Hispanic patients or those primarily insured by Medicaid were less likely to undergo radical prostatectomy at such hospitals.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23253307     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Impact of delay on telesurgical performance: study on the robotic simulator dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Song Xu; Sanket Chauhan; Alyssa Tanaka; Khara Simpson; Haidar Abdul-Muhsin; Roger Smith
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Treatment of men with high-risk prostate cancer based on race, insurance coverage, and access to advanced technology.

Authors:  Robert Steven Gerhard; Dattatraya Patil; Yuan Liu; Kenneth Ogan; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Ashesh B Jani; Omer N Kucuk; Viraj A Master; Theresa W Gillespie; Christopher P Filson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  The surgical approach can be determined from the pathological specimen obtained after open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Justine Varinot; Christophe Vaessen; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Pierre Mozer; Shahrokh F Shariat; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement by type of radical prostatectomy: results from a privately insured patient population.

Authors:  S P Kim; C P Gross; M C Smaldone; L C Han; H Van Houten; Y Lotan; R S Svatek; R H Thompson; R J Karnes; Q-D Trinh; A Kutikov; N D Shah
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Aditya Mantha; Ahmad Abiri; Anne Lin; Erik Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Understanding the Current Role of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Francesca M Dimou; Nicole Ackermann; Su-Hsin Chang; Dawn Freeman; J Christopher Eagon; Shaina R Eckhouse
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of radical prostatectomy: a new perspective on an old story.

Authors:  Marco Paciotti; Vittorio Fasulo; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

Review 8.  Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; Shahin Tabatabaei; Henry H Woo; M Pilar Laguna; Hamidreza Shemshaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery in prostate, uterus, and colorectal procedures: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Gary Chung; Piet Hinoul; Paul Coplan; Andrew Yoo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-20

10.  Robotic prostatectomy is associated with increased patient travel and treatment delay.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.