Literature DB >> 23253130

Accounting for receptor flexibility and enhanced sampling methods in computer-aided drug design.

William Sinko1, Steffen Lindert, J Andrew McCammon.   

Abstract

Protein flexibility plays a major role in biomolecular recognition. In many cases, it is not obvious how molecular structure will change upon association with other molecules. In proteins, these changes can be major, with large deviations in overall backbone structure, or they can be more subtle as in a side-chain rotation. Either way the algorithms that predict the favorability of biomolecular association require relatively accurate predictions of the bound structure to give an accurate assessment of the energy involved in association. Here, we review a number of techniques that have been proposed to accommodate receptor flexibility in the simulation of small molecules binding to protein receptors. We investigate modifications to standard rigid receptor docking algorithms and also explore enhanced sampling techniques, and the combination of free energy calculations and enhanced sampling techniques. The understanding and allowance for receptor flexibility are helping to make computer simulations of ligand protein binding more accurate. These developments may help improve the efficiency of drug discovery and development. Efficiency will be essential as we begin to see personalized medicine tailored to individual patients, which means specific drugs are needed for each patient's genetic makeup.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23253130      PMCID: PMC3540989          DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des        ISSN: 1747-0277            Impact factor:   2.817


  61 in total

1.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Molecular basis of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COXs) selective inhibition.

Authors:  Vittorio Limongelli; Massimiliano Bonomi; Luciana Marinelli; Francesco Luigi Gervasio; Andrea Cavalli; Ettore Novellino; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols.

Authors:  David J Osguthorpe; Woody Sherman; Arnold T Hagler
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Rosetta Ligand docking with flexible XML protocols.

Authors:  Gordon Lemmon; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  Computer-aided identification of Trypanosoma brucei uridine diphosphate galactose 4'-epimerase inhibitors: toward the development of novel therapies for African sleeping sickness.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Michael D Urbaniak; Michael A J Ferguson; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  On the application of accelerated molecular dynamics to liquid water simulations.

Authors:  César Augusto F de Oliveira; Donald Hamelberg; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Protecting High Energy Barriers: A New Equation to Regulate Boost Energy in Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  William Sinko; César Augusto F de Oliveira; Levi C T Pierce; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Riccardo Baron; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Exploring Binding Mechanisms in Nuclear Hormone Receptors by Monte Carlo and X-ray-derived Motions.

Authors:  Christoph Grebner; Daniel Lecina; Victor Gil; Johan Ulander; Pia Hansson; Anita Dellsen; Christian Tyrchan; Karl Edman; Anders Hogner; Victor Guallar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Successful Identification of Cardiac Troponin Calcium Sensitizers Using a Combination of Virtual Screening and ROC Analysis of Known Troponin C Binders.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Svetlana B Tikunova; Morgan V Price; Andres F Cuesta; Jonathan P Davis; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  A generalized framework for computational design and mutational scanning of T-cell receptor binding interfaces.

Authors:  Timothy P Riley; Cory M Ayres; Lance M Hellman; Nishant K Singh; Michael Cosiano; Jennifer M Cimons; Michael J Anderson; Kurt H Piepenbrink; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  D Sam Paul; N Gautham
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Improving inverse docking target identification with Z-score selection.

Authors:  Stephanie S Kim; Melanie L Aprahamian; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.817

7.  Drug screening strategy for human membrane proteins: from NMR protein backbone structure to in silica- and NMR-screened hits.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Innokentiy Maslennikov; Ellis J C Chiu; Levi C Pierce; J Andrew McCammon; Senyon Choe
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.

Authors:  Matthew P Baumgartner; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Matthew Bartolowits; V Jo Davisson
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.817

10.  Comparison of dynamics of wildtype and V94M human UDP-galactose 4-epimerase-A computational perspective on severe epimerase-deficiency galactosemia.

Authors:  David J Timson; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.