Literature DB >> 23252671

A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence.

Jeffrey A Hostetler1, David P Onorato, Deborah Jansen, Madan K Oli.   

Abstract

1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics and persistence of the endangered Florida panther Puma concolor coryi population and evaluated the potential influence of genetic restoration on population growth and persistence parameters. As part of the genetic restoration programme, eight female Texas pumas P. c. stanleyana were released into Florida panther habitat in southern Florida in 1995. 3. The overall asymptotic population growth rate (λ) was 1.04 (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.95-1.14), suggesting an increase in the panther population of approximately 4% per year. Considering the effects of environmental and demographic stochasticities and density-dependence, the probability that the population will fall below 10 panthers within 100 years was 0.072 (0-0.606). 4. Our results suggest that the population would have declined at 5% per year (λ = 0.95; 0.83-1.08) in the absence of genetic restoration. Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that the positive effect of genetic restoration on survival of kittens was primarily responsible for the substantial growth of the panther population that would otherwise have been declining. 5. For comparative purposes, we also estimated probability of quasi-extinction under two scenarios - implementation of genetic restoration and no genetic restoration initiative - using the estimated abundance of panthers in 1995, the year genetic restoration was initiated. Assuming no density-dependence, the probability that the panther population would fall below 10 panthers by 2010 was 0.098 (0.002-0.332) for the restoration scenario and 0.445 (0.032-0.944) for the no restoration scenario, providing further evidence that the panther population would have faced a substantially higher risk of extinction if the genetic restoration initiative had not been implemented. 6. Our results, along with those reporting increases in population size and improvements in biomedical correlates of inbreeding depression, provide strong evidence that genetic restoration substantially contributed to the observed increases in the Florida panther population.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Florida panther; Puma concolor coryi; density‐dependence; genetic introgression; genetic restoration; population viability analysis; probability of extinction; stochastic population growth rate; stochasticity; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23252671     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  12 in total

1.  Exploring genetic variation and population structure in a threatened species, Noturus placidus, with whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Lynsey K Whitacre; Mark L Wildhaber; Gary S Johnson; Harly J Durbin; Troy N Rowan; Peoria Tribe; Robert D Schnabel; Tendai Mhlanga-Mutangadura; Vernon M Tabor; Daniel Fenner; Jared E Decker
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Survival and Mortality of Pumas (Puma concolor) in a Fragmented, Urbanizing Landscape.

Authors:  T Winston Vickers; Jessica N Sanchez; Christine K Johnson; Scott A Morrison; Randy Botta; Trish Smith; Brian S Cohen; Patrick R Huber; Holly B Ernest; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Carnivora population dynamics are as slow and as fast as those of other mammals: implications for their conservation.

Authors:  Madelon van de Kerk; Hans de Kroon; Dalia A Conde; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hybridization facilitates evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  Rike B Stelkens; Michael A Brockhurst; Gregory D D Hurst; Duncan Greig
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Analysing the natural population growth of a large marine mammal after a depletive harvest.

Authors:  M A Romero; M F Grandi; M Koen-Alonso; G Svendsen; M Ocampo Reinaldo; N A García; S L Dans; R González; E A Crespo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genetic rescue, the greater prairie chicken and the problem of conservation reliance in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  S M Mussmann; M R Douglas; W J B Anthonysamy; M A Davis; S A Simpson; W Louis; M E Douglas
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Complex problems need detailed solutions: Harnessing multiple data types to inform genetic management in the wild.

Authors:  Catherine E Grueber; Samantha Fox; Elspeth A McLennan; Rebecca M Gooley; David Pemberton; Carolyn J Hogg; Katherine Belov
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  A Road Map for 21st Century Genetic Restoration: Gene Pool Enrichment of the Black-Footed Ferret.

Authors:  Samantha M Wisely; Oliver A Ryder; Rachel M Santymire; John F Engelhardt; Ben J Novak
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Time-series analysis reveals genetic responses to intensive management of razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus).

Authors:  Thomas E Dowling; Thomas F Turner; Evan W Carson; Melody J Saltzgiver; Deborah Adams; Brian Kesner; Paul C Marsh
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Unexpected but welcome. Artificially selected traits may increase fitness in wild boar.

Authors:  Domenico Fulgione; Daniela Rippa; Maria Buglione; Martina Trapanese; Simona Petrelli; Valeria Maselli
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.