Literature DB >> 23252601

Acceptability and adherence in a chemoprevention trial among women at increased risk for breast cancer attending the Modena Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center (Italy).

Elisabetta Razzaboni1, Angela Toss, Laura Cortesi, Isabella Marchi, Federica Sebastiani, Elisabetta De Matteis, Massimo Federico.   

Abstract

Chemoprevention for women at risk for breast cancer has been shown to be effective, but in actual practice, women's uptake of chemoprevention has been poor. We explored factors that influence acceptability, adherence, and dropout in the International Breast (Prevention) Intervention Study during our first 3 years of activity at the Modena Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center. We evaluated socio-demographic characteristics, health status, adherence, and side effect intensity. Semi-structured interviews analyzed reasons for accepting/refusing/stopping the trial. A total of 471 postmenopausal women were invited to participate, of which 319 declined to participate (68%), 137 accepted to participate (29%), and 15 participants did not make a final decision (3%). Breast cancer-related worries and trust in our preventive and surveillance programs were the most frequent reasons for accepting. Side effect-related worry was the most frequent reason for refusing. General practitioners' and family members' opinions played an important role in the decision-making process. Adherence significantly decreased after a 12-month follow-up, but it remained unchanged after 24- and 36-month follow-ups. Mild/moderate side effects reported by women did not change after 12 months of treatment. Forty percent of women withdrew from the study due to complaints of side effects. We concluded that chemoprevention trials are difficult medical experiments and that the process of deciding about whether or not to participate is based mainly on beliefs and values. This study has important clinical implications. During counselling with prospective participants, it is important to emphasize the potential benefits and to promote an informed choice. How participants make decisions, their belief systems, and their perception of risk are all factors that should be investigated in future research.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23252601     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  15 in total

1.  The PARP inhibitors, veliparib and olaparib, are effective chemopreventive agents for delaying mammary tumor development in BRCA1-deficient mice.

Authors:  Ciric To; Eun-Hee Kim; Darlene B Royce; Charlotte R Williams; Ryan M Collins; Renee Risingsong; Michael B Sporn; Karen T Liby
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-05-09

2.  Design and Usability of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated, Point-of-Care, Clinical Decision Support Tool for Modeling and Simulation of Antihemophilic Factors.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Harpreet Gill; Shannon L Carpenter; Pathe Gueye; Brian Wicklund; Matt Breitkreutz; Arindam Ghosh; Avinash Kollu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  Hereditary ovarian cancer: not only BRCA 1 and 2 genes.

Authors:  Angela Toss; Chiara Tomasello; Elisabetta Razzaboni; Giannina Contu; Giovanni Grandi; Angelo Cagnacci; Russell J Schilder; Laura Cortesi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Decision aids for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Ilona Juraskova; Carissa Bonner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  Motivators and barriers of tamoxifen use as risk-reducing medication amongst women at increased breast cancer risk: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  B Meiser; W K T Wong; M Peate; C Julian-Reynier; J Kirk; G Mitchell
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Participant-Reported Symptoms and Their Effect on Long-Term Adherence in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I (IBIS I).

Authors:  Samuel George Smith; Ivana Sestak; Anthony Howell; John Forbes; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The impact of reproductive life on breast cancer risk in women with family history or BRCA mutation.

Authors:  Angela Toss; Giovanni Grandi; Angelo Cagnacci; Luigi Marcheselli; Silvia Pavesi; Elisabetta De Matteis; Elisabetta Razzaboni; Chiara Tomasello; Stefano Cascinu; Laura Cortesi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-07

8.  Awareness of preventive medication among women at high risk for breast cancer and their willingness to consider transdermal or oral tamoxifen: a focus group study.

Authors:  Lindsey C Karavites; Subhashini Allu; Seema A Khan; Karen Kaiser
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S G Smith; I Sestak; A Forster; A Partridge; L Side; M S Wolf; R Horne; J Wardle; J Cuzick
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Secondary Prevention in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Syndromes Other Than BRCA.

Authors:  Claudia Piombino; Laura Cortesi; Matteo Lambertini; Kevin Punie; Giovanni Grandi; Angela Toss
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.