| Literature DB >> 23251379 |
Stefan Weigel1, Thomas Osterwalder, Ursina Tobler, Li Yao, Manuel Wiesli, Thomas Lehnert, Abhay Pandit, Arie Bruinink.
Abstract
The treatment of critical size peripheral nerve defects represents one of the most serious problems in neurosurgery. If the gap size exceeds a certain limit, healing can't be achieved. Connection mismatching may further reduce the clinical success. The present study investigates how far specific surface structures support neurite outgrowth and by that may represent one possibility to push distance limits that can be bridged. For this purpose,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23251379 PMCID: PMC3520951 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Topographically structured surfaces.
A: Schematic representation of a surface consisting of two planar areas and an area with parallel ridges. Growth cones (black arrows) growing out from a reaggregate of spinal cord neurons (black circles, placed in one of the planar areas) into the topographically structured area. The grey rectangle corresponds to the area shown in the images below; the black rectangle is the selected field for live monitoring as shown in Fig. 2. B–L: SEM images of topographical structures, B 5-5; C 10-10; D 25-25; E 50-50 and F 100-100 (ridge width and inter-ridge distance in µm). Structure height: B–F, 1.3 µm.
Figure 2SEM pictures of three particular fibers.
Viscose (A, D), PET50 (B, E) and PET50/7 with laser induced grooves of 7 µm depth (C, F); scale bar in A, B & C = 50 µm and in D, E, F = 5 µm. Inset in A shows the fiber holder. Fibers are spanned over the hole in the middle of the device and fixed on the surface by Teflon plugs. Reaggregates are placed nearby the fibers on the coated Teflon planar surface.
Figure 3Fluorescent images and analysis of neurite outgrowth.
A: Neurite outgrowth on a structured surface. The last picture taken of a live monitoring experiment (left) and the obtained trajectories (right) are shown. Neurites are growing from a single spinal cord reaggregate placed on the planar part into the ridge area (inter-ridge space 5 µm, ridge width 5 µm and ridge height 1.3 µm). B: Pictures of neurons growing on unstructured (left) or structured (right) PET fibers at different time points.
Figure 4Neurite outgrowth on planar structured samples.
A: Changes in velocity of an exemplary neurite. Neurites generally grow stepwise, with periods of relatively slow growth intercepted by bursts of rapid growth cone progression. B & C: Histogram of the frequency distribution of neurite outgrowth velocities on plane polyimide (PI) and SiO2 (B) and structured SiO2-PI surfaces with 10 µm wide ridges separated by an inter-ridge distance of 10 µm (C). The dislocation of the neurite growth cone after each 5 minutes period was taken to calculate the velocities. The velocities of all neurites measured on the mentioned surface were pooled. Each bar represents the velocity frequency over an interval of 25 µm/h. Below each bar only the upper velocity limit is given. Note that 4 peak frequencies were found corresponding to the velocity intervals: [(−100)–(−75)], [(−50)–(−25)], [25]–[50] and [75–100] (expressed in µm/h).
Figure 5Comparison of growth cone outgrowth velocities (v+), retraction velocities (v−) velocities and the frequency of measured velocities being positive (%v+).
Data are shown for experiments on SiO2-PI surfaces with ridges of different height and inter-ridge distances (A), on unstructured and structured surfaces with different inter-ridge distances (B, data of 1.3 and 3.0 µm height ridges pooled) and C on different structured or unstructured textile fibers and the respective control. Note: Due to the curvature of textile fibers only growth velocities along the axis of the fiber (0°±10°; 180°±10°) and the frequency of growth into fiber direction (%v(0°)) were analyzed in C. PI a-C:H and SiO2 a-C:H are planar polyimide and SiO2 surfaces coated with a-C:H. Asterisks (*; p<0.05) indicate significant different v+ compared to v− on the same surface, rhomb (#) significant different %v(0°) to control and a plus (+) significant different %v(0°) on fibers with grooves to PET50.
Figure 6Percentage of neurites not crossing the ridges (data of all experiments using SiO2-PI and a-C:H surfaces were pooled).
Values are based on behavior of 28 to 85 neurites. Note that for a ridge height of 3 µm none of the monitored growth cones crossed the ridges as far as the inter-ridge distance is 10 µm or more.
Figure 7Net migration velocity.
A: Net growth cone dislocation per time unit (vnet) on planar PI or SiO2 surfaces and SiO2-PI surfaces with different ridge width and interridge distances, without or with a-C:H coating (data of 1.3 and 3.0 µm high ridges were pooled); *: p<0.05 significant different from uncoated SiO2; #: p<0.05 significant different from uncoated PI. B: Net outgrowth on the various fibers. *: p<0.05 significant different from control surface. #: p<0.05 significant different from PET50.