Literature DB >> 2325130

Reversible and irreversible changes in nucleosome structure along the c-fos and c-myc oncogenes following inhibition of transcription.

T A Chen1, R Sterner, A Cozzolino, V G Allfrey.   

Abstract

A new affinity chromatographic procedure for the separation of transcriptionally active nucleosomes has been used to study the changes that take place in chromatin structure along the c-fos and c-myc genes when RNA synthesis is inhibited. Mercury-affinity chromatography separates the sulfhydryl-reactive nucleosomes of transcriptionally active genes from the compactly beaded, non-reactive nucleosomes of transcriptionally inert DNA sequences. The new procedure also discriminates between nucleosomes that have "unfolded" to reveal the previously shielded SH groups of histone H3 and nucleosomes that bind to the mercury column because of their association with thiol-containing non-histone proteins located in the transcription unit. Both classes of Hg-bound nucleosomes contain the c-fos and c-myc sequences, but only when they are being transcribed. We compared the effects of alpha-amanitin and actinomycin D on the transcription of c-fos and c-myc with the effects of each inhibitor on the distribution of the corresponding oncogenic DNA sequences in the chromatographically separated nucleosome fractions. It was found that the inhibition of RNA polymerase II by alpha-amanitin (added at the peaks of c-fos or c-myc expression in serum-stimulated BALB/c 3T3 cells) resulted in a rapid loss of affinity of the oncogene-containing nucleosomes for the mercury column. There was no corresponding effect on the mercury-binding properties of nucleosomes containing 28 S ribosomal gene sequences, which continue to be transcribed by amanitin-resistant RNA polymerase I. Therefore, the binding of the c-fos and c-myc nucleosomes to the mercury column seems to depend upon reversible structural changes associated with their transcription. Surprisingly, there was no corresponding loss of affinity of the c-fos and c-myc nucleosomes for the mercury column when actinomycin D was employed to inhibit RNA synthesis, despite the fact that transcription of both genes had been arrested abruptly. Measurements of [3H]actinomycin D binding show its preferential intercalation into the transcriptionally active nucleosomes. We suggest that the intercalation of actinomycin D into the DNA of active nucleosomes can lock the transcription complex into an "unfolded" but potentially active configuration. This was confirmed by run-off transcription assays showing a restoration of c-fos and c-myc RNA synthesis when actinomycin D was displaced by proflavine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2325130     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90327-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  17 in total

1.  Purification and initial characterization of primate satellite chromatin.

Authors:  A Jasinskas; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Growth regulation of human variant histone genes and acetylation of the encoded proteins.

Authors:  D Alvelo-Ceron; L Niu; D G Collart
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Nuclear matrix, dynamic histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin.

Authors:  J R Davie
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Histone acetylation: influence on transcription, nucleosome mobility and positioning, and linker histone-dependent transcriptional repression.

Authors:  K Ura; H Kurumizaka; S Dimitrov; G Almouzni; A P Wolffe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Effects of histone acetylation, ubiquitination and variants on nucleosome stability.

Authors:  W Li; S Nagaraja; G P Delcuve; M J Hendzel; J R Davie
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Isolation of active genes containing CAG repeats by DNA strand invasion by a peptide nucleic acid.

Authors:  L C Boffa; E M Carpaneto; V G Allfrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  DNA-protein interactions and spatial organization of DNA.

Authors:  W A Krajewski; S V Razin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Quantification of DNaseI-sensitivity by real-time PCR: quantitative analysis of DNaseI-hypersensitivity of the mouse beta-globin LCR.

Authors:  M McArthur; S Gerum; G Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Ellipticine increases the superhelical density of intracellular SV40 DNA by intercalation.

Authors:  Y Chu; M T Hsu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A role for histones H2A/H2B in chromatin folding and transcriptional repression.

Authors:  J C Hansen; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.