| Literature DB >> 23251254 |
Guocai Li1, Lunxiu Qin, Qinghai Ye, Qiongzhu Dong, Ning Ren, Huliang Jia.
Abstract
The interaction between cancer and the organ microenvironment is complex, and the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/Smad pathway plays an important role in this interaction. However, the role of the organ microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well understood. To evaluate the effect of the organ microenvironment and the role of the TGF-β/Smad pathway, MHCC97-H cells were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice and the resulting MHCC97-H subcutaneous tumor tissues were implanted into the livers of the mice. We found a higher tumor weight and less pulmonary metastasis for the cancers in liver sites than for those in subcutaneous sites; the TGF-β1 levels were significantly different between the tumor models and correlated with tumor metastasis. Our results suggest that the organ microenvironment affects the growth and invasion of liver cancer cells. The TGF-β/Smad pathway is significant in the interaction between HCC and its microenvironment and affects the progression of HCC.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23251254 PMCID: PMC3524250 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2012.752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Tumor weight and pulmonary metastasis rate in two models of hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Model | No. of cases | Tumor weight (g) (mean ± SD) | Metastatic rate, % (n/total) | No. of metastatic foci (mean ± SD) | No. of metastatic cells (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHCC97-H | 26 | 1.83±0.75 | 69.2 (18/26) | 4.72±5.50 | 119.11±185.92 |
| Xenograft | 17 | 2.89±0.84 | 64.7 (11/17) | 2.27±1.01 | 85.18±79.96 |
SD, standard deviation;
P<0.01, compared with the MHCC97-H group;
P=0.08, compared with MHCC97-H group.
In vivo expression of TGF-β1/Smad mRNA in two mice models.
| 95% CI
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRNA | Models | 2−ΔΔCt (mean ± SD) | Lower bound | Higher bound | P-value |
| TGF-β1 | MHCC97 | 1.92±1.70 | 1.23 | 2.61 | 0.035 |
| Xenograft | 0.97±0.73 | 0.59 | 1.35 | ||
| Smad2 | MHCC97 | 1.17±1.09 | 0.73 | 1.61 | 0.89 |
| Xenograft | 1.13±0.31 | 0.98 | 1.29 | ||
| Smad7 | MHCC97 | 1.46±0.97 | 1.07 | 1.85 | 0.17 |
| Xenograft | 1.10±0.52 | 0.83 | 1.37 | ||
Student’s t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of differences between two groups. TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval for mean; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1TGF-β protein levels in two animal models. (A) TGF-β protein levels in the MHCC97-H model were higher than in the xenograft model by ELISA, *P<0.05. (B) TGF-β protein levels in the MHCC97-H model were higher than in the xenograft model by western blot analysis. (C) The expression of TGF-β1 in (a) the MHCC97-H model and (b) the xenograft model by immunohistochemical staining. The brown-yellow color is positive staining (x20 objective field). TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1.
Figure 2Correlation between Smad and tumor weight. (A) The expression of Smad2 and Smad7 was linearly correlated by regression analysis. (B) Smad7 expression was linearly correlated with tumor weight. Dots denote the samples. The lines are regression lines. R, correlation coefficient; P, P-value.
Comparison of TGF-β1/Smad mRNA between metastatic and non-metastatic samples.
| 95% CI
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRNA | Metastasis | No. | 2−ΔΔCt (mean ± SD) | Lower bound | Higher bound | P-value |
| TGF-β1 | None | 14 | 1.10±0.83 | 0.61 | 1.58 | 0.024 |
| Lower | 14 | 1.16±0.63 | 0.79 | 1.53 | ||
| Higher | 15 | 2.32±2.11 | 1.16 | 3.49 | ||
| Smad2 | None | 14 | 1.23±1.35 | 0.45 | 2.01 | 0.65 |
| Lower | 14 | 0.97±0.55 | 0.65 | 1.30 | ||
| Higher | 15 | 1.25±0.47 | 0.99 | 1.52 | ||
| Smad7 | None | 14 | 1.28±1.95 | 0.59 | 1.97 | 0.89 |
| Lower | 14 | 1.26±0.62 | 0.91 | 1.62 | ||
| Higher | 15 | 1.40±0.62 | 1.06 | 1.75 | ||
Student’s t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of differences between the two groups. TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval for the mean; SD, standard deviation.