BACKGROUND: Melanoma radioresistance has been attributed to the presence of tumor cells with highly efficient DNA damage repair mechanisms. We examined the expression of genes involved in DNA damage repair and DNA damage sensing, and assessed their modulation by SLUG silencing, which is potentially capable of increasing radiosensitivity. METHODS: Two melanoma cell lines (M14 and M79) were used to evaluate in vitro radiation-induced cytotoxicity before and after SLUG silencing. mRNA expression levels of BRCA1, ERCC1, DNA-PK, PARP, MGMT, ATM and TGM2 were determined by real-time RT-PCR, and protein expression levels of SLUG, caspase 3, p21, PUMA and pMAPK by Western blotting. RESULTS: The cytotoxic effect of radiation was high in M14 and low in M79 cells. SLUG silencing increased the interference of radiation on cell cycle distribution and cell killing by 60 % and 80 % in M79 cells after a 2.4 Gy and 5 Gy radiation dose, respectively. It also led to a significant inhibition of expression of genes involved in DNA damage repair and DNA damage sensing in all cell lines maintained after radiation. An almost total inhibition was observed for TGM2, which is expressed at a high basal level in the most radioresistant cell line (M79). Protein expression of PUMA was induced by radiation and was enhanced after SLUG silencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal a pivotal role of SLUG in regulating a cellular network involved in the response to DNA damage, and highlight the importance of TGM2 in radiosensitivity modulation. SLUG silencing appears to increase radiation sensitivity of the melanoma cells tested.
BACKGROUND:Melanoma radioresistance has been attributed to the presence of tumor cells with highly efficient DNA damage repair mechanisms. We examined the expression of genes involved in DNA damage repair and DNA damage sensing, and assessed their modulation by SLUG silencing, which is potentially capable of increasing radiosensitivity. METHODS: Two melanoma cell lines (M14 and M79) were used to evaluate in vitro radiation-induced cytotoxicity before and after SLUG silencing. mRNA expression levels of BRCA1, ERCC1, DNA-PK, PARP, MGMT, ATM and TGM2 were determined by real-time RT-PCR, and protein expression levels of SLUG, caspase 3, p21, PUMA and pMAPK by Western blotting. RESULTS: The cytotoxic effect of radiation was high in M14 and low in M79 cells. SLUG silencing increased the interference of radiation on cell cycle distribution and cell killing by 60 % and 80 % in M79 cells after a 2.4 Gy and 5 Gy radiation dose, respectively. It also led to a significant inhibition of expression of genes involved in DNA damage repair and DNA damage sensing in all cell lines maintained after radiation. An almost total inhibition was observed for TGM2, which is expressed at a high basal level in the most radioresistant cell line (M79). Protein expression of PUMA was induced by radiation and was enhanced after SLUG silencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal a pivotal role of SLUG in regulating a cellular network involved in the response to DNA damage, and highlight the importance of TGM2 in radiosensitivity modulation. SLUG silencing appears to increase radiation sensitivity of the melanoma cells tested.
Authors: P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1990-07-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kenneth R Olivier; Steven E Schild; Christopher G Morris; Paul D Brown; Svetomir N Markovic Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bea Pauwels; Annelies E C Korst; Christel M J de Pooter; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Marc F D Baay; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2003-01-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: M Pérez-Caro; C Bermejo-Rodríguez; I González-Herrero; M Sánchez-Beato; M A Piris; I Sánchez-García Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-01-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kristina Goetze; Christian G Fabian; Andrea Siebers; Livia Binz; Daniel Faber; Stefano Indraccolo; Giorgia Nardo; Ulrike G A Sattler; Wolfgang Mueller-Klieser Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Y M Luo; N X Xia; L Yang; Z Li; H Yang; H J Yu; Y Liu; H Lei; F X Zhou; C H Xie; Y F Zhou Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: S Bravaccini; M M Tumedei; E Scarpi; W Zoli; C Rengucci; L Serra; A Curcio; F Buggi; S Folli; A Rocca; R Maltoni; M Puccetti; D Amadori; R Silvestrini Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ulvi Ahmadov; Daniel Picard; Jasmin Bartl; Manuela Silginer; Marija Trajkovic-Arsic; Nan Qin; Lena Blümel; Marietta Wolter; Jonathan K M Lim; David Pauck; Alina Marie Winkelkotte; Marlen Melcher; Maike Langini; Viktoria Marquardt; Felix Sander; Anja Stefanski; Sascha Steltgens; Christina Hassiepen; Anna Kaufhold; Frauke-Dorothee Meyer; Annette Seibt; Lara Kleinesudeik; Anika Hain; Carsten Münk; Christiane Brigitte Knobbe-Thomsen; Alexander Schramm; Ute Fischer; Gabriel Leprivier; Kai Stühler; Simone Fulda; Jens T Siveke; Felix Distelmaier; Arndt Borkhardt; Michael Weller; Patrick Roth; Guido Reifenberger; Marc Remke Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 8.469