Literature DB >> 23248894

A 4-week clinical comparison of a novel multi-directional power brush to a manual toothbrush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque.

Naresh C Sharma1, Malgorzata Klukowska, Agnieszka Mielczarek, Julie M Grender, Jimmy Qaqish.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel multi-directional power toothbrush in reducing plaque and gingivitis relative to a standard manual toothbrush control.
METHODS: This 4-week, randomized and controlled, single-center, parallel group, examiner-blinded clinical study enrolled adults with mild-to-moderate gingivitis. At baseline, pre-treatment gingivitis and plaque levels were assessed via the Lobene Modified Gingival Index (MGI), the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI). Subjects qualifying were assigned randomly to one of two toothbrush groups: a novel multi-directional power toothbrush (Oral-B Professional Deep Sweep TRICLEAN 1000, also marketed as Oral-B TriZone) or a standard soft manual control toothbrush. Aside from a supervised brushing at baseline on-site, subjects brushed at home twice daily with their assigned test brush. After 1 week, subjects returned for RMNPI plaque evaluations. At Week 4, subjects were again recalled to evaluate toothbrush efficacy, and received MGI and GBI gingivitis and RMNPI plaque evaluations.
RESULTS: 119 evaluable subjects completed the study. Both the novel power and manual control toothbrushes yielded statistically significant (P < 0.001) mean plaque reductions compared to baseline at Weeks 1 and 4 (except Week 1 manual brush gingival margin) and significant mean MGI and GBI gingivitis reductions (P < 0.001). Comparing the relative effectiveness of the test brushes, the novel multi-directional power brush produced significantly superior anti-gingivitis and anti-plaque reductions compared to pre-treatment relative to the manual control brush in every analysis at both time points. The Week 4 adjusted mean relative reductions favoring the multi-directional power brush were 3 and 1.49 times greater for whole mouth MGI and GBI, respectively (P < 0.001); and were 2.1, 4.7 and 2 times greater for the RMNPI whole mouth, gingival margin and interproximal regions, respectively (P < 0.001). Both toothbrushes were well-tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23248894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  4 in total

Review 1.  Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.

Authors:  Munirah Yaacob; Helen V Worthington; Scott A Deacon; Chris Deery; A Damien Walmsley; Peter G Robinson; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-17

2.  Efficacy of a Hybrid Toothbrush versus Comparative Manual Toothbrush for Plaque Removal - Randomized In-Use Study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Favrel; Anna Urbaniak; Izabela Chabowska; Anne Sirvent; Jean-Philippe Gatignol
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-06-29

3.  Plaque Removal Efficacy of Different Toothbrushes: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Neha Aggarwal; Sunil Gupta; Rashu Grover; Gunmeen Sadana; Karan Bansal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

4.  Plaque removal by a novel prototype power toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush: A randomized, exploratory clinical study.

Authors:  Paola Gomez-Pereira; Alyson Axe; Andrew Butler; Jimmy Qaqish; Chhaju R Goyal
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.