BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid increase in screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) over the past several years in North America. This could paradoxically lead to worsening outcomes if the system is not adapted to deal with the increased demand. For example, this could create increased wait times for endoscopy and delayed time to CRC diagnosis, which could worsen clinical outcomes such as stage at diagnosis and⁄or survival. No previous Canadian study has evaluated the association between time to CRC diagnosis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The present historical cohort study used Manitoba's population-based cancer registry and Manitoba Health administrative databases. The effect of time to diagnosis on patient survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with adjustment for stage at diagnosis, grade of CRC, age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity index score and year of CRC diagnosis. The association between time to diagnosis and CRC stage at diagnosis was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median time to CRC diagnosis increased significantly from 72 days (95% CI 61 days to 83 days) in 2004 to 105 days (95% CI 64 days to 129 days) in the first three months of 2009 (P=0.04). There was no significant association between time to diagnosis and survival. Individuals with the longest time to diagnosis were less likely to have stage III⁄IV CRC at diagnosis (quartile 4 versus quartile 1: OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.75). CONCLUSION: Time to CRC diagnosis is continuing to increase in Manitoba. Although the present study did not detect a significant negative clinical effect of increasing time to diagnosis, additional studies are required.
BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid increase in screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) over the past several years in North America. This could paradoxically lead to worsening outcomes if the system is not adapted to deal with the increased demand. For example, this could create increased wait times for endoscopy and delayed time to CRC diagnosis, which could worsen clinical outcomes such as stage at diagnosis and⁄or survival. No previous Canadian study has evaluated the association between time to CRC diagnosis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The present historical cohort study used Manitoba's population-based cancer registry and Manitoba Health administrative databases. The effect of time to diagnosis on patient survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with adjustment for stage at diagnosis, grade of CRC, age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity index score and year of CRC diagnosis. The association between time to diagnosis and CRC stage at diagnosis was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median time to CRC diagnosis increased significantly from 72 days (95% CI 61 days to 83 days) in 2004 to 105 days (95% CI 64 days to 129 days) in the first three months of 2009 (P=0.04). There was no significant association between time to diagnosis and survival. Individuals with the longest time to diagnosis were less likely to have stage III⁄IV CRC at diagnosis (quartile 4 versus quartile 1: OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.75). CONCLUSION: Time to CRC diagnosis is continuing to increase in Manitoba. Although the present study did not detect a significant negative clinical effect of increasing time to diagnosis, additional studies are required.
Authors: Vijaya Sundararajan; Hude Quan; Patricia Halfon; Kiyohide Fushimi; Jean-Christophe Luthi; Bernard Burnand; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: H Singh; C De Coster; E Shu; K Fradette; S Latosinsky; M Pitz; M Cheang; D Turner Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Maria Ramos; Magdalena Esteva; Elena Cabeza; Carlos Campillo; Joan Llobera; Antonio Aguiló Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Rachel B Issaka; Li Li; Catherine Fedorenko; Cynthia W Ko; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-02-12
Authors: Chanpreet S Arhi; Elaine M Burns; Alex Bottle; George Bouras; Paul Aylin; Paul Ziprin; Ara Darzi Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Gretchen C Edwards; Adriana C Gamboa; Michael P Feng; Roberta L Muldoon; Michael B Hopkins; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Glen C Balch; Jennifer Holder-Murray; Maryam Mohammed; Scott E Regenbogen; Matthew L Silviera; Alexander T Hawkins Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: R D Neal; P Tharmanathan; B France; N U Din; S Cotton; J Fallon-Ferguson; W Hamilton; A Hendry; M Hendry; R Lewis; U Macleod; E D Mitchell; M Pickett; T Rai; K Shaw; N Stuart; M L Tørring; C Wilkinson; B Williams; N Williams; J Emery Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Magdalena Esteva; Alfonso Leiva; María Ramos-Monserrat; Alejandro Espí; Luis González-Luján; Francesc Macià; Cristiane Murta-Nascimento; María A Sánchez-Calavera; Rosa Magallón; Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Sonia Pertega-Díaz Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 4.638