AIMS: To investigate whether low systolic blood pressure is predictive for increased mortality risk in 90-year-old subjects without heart failure, defined by low levels of NT-proBNP, as well as in 90-year-old subjects with high levels of NT-proBNP. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was embedded in the Leiden 85-plus Study, an observational population-based prospective study. All 90-year-old participants (n = 267) were included between 2002 and 2004 and followed up for mortality for at least 5 years. Differences in mortality risks were compared between participants with low systolic blood pressure (≤150 mmHg) and high systolic blood pressure (>150 mmHg) within strata of low NT-proBNP (<284 pg/mL for women and <306 pg/mL for men = lowest tertile) vs. high NT-proBNP (middle and highest tertile) at age 90 years. During maximal follow-up of 7.2 years, 212 participants (79%) died. Among participants with low NT-proBNP, low systolic blood pressure gave a two-fold increased risk (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.4) compared with participants with high systolic blood pressure. For participants with high NT-proBNP, low systolic blood pressure provided a 1.7 increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.3) compared with high systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Low systolic blood pressure is predictive for increased mortality risk in 90-year-old subjects, irrespective of the NT-proBNP level. Therefore, the absence or presence of heart failure as determined by NT-proBNP does not influence the prognostic value of low systolic blood pressure with regard to mortality in the oldest old.
AIMS: To investigate whether low systolic blood pressure is predictive for increased mortality risk in 90-year-old subjects without heart failure, defined by low levels of NT-proBNP, as well as in 90-year-old subjects with high levels of NT-proBNP. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was embedded in the Leiden 85-plus Study, an observational population-based prospective study. All 90-year-old participants (n = 267) were included between 2002 and 2004 and followed up for mortality for at least 5 years. Differences in mortality risks were compared between participants with low systolic blood pressure (≤150 mmHg) and high systolic blood pressure (>150 mmHg) within strata of low NT-proBNP (<284 pg/mL for women and <306 pg/mL for men = lowest tertile) vs. high NT-proBNP (middle and highest tertile) at age 90 years. During maximal follow-up of 7.2 years, 212 participants (79%) died. Among participants with low NT-proBNP, low systolic blood pressure gave a two-fold increased risk (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.4) compared with participants with high systolic blood pressure. For participants with high NT-proBNP, low systolic blood pressure provided a 1.7 increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.3) compared with high systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Low systolic blood pressure is predictive for increased mortality risk in 90-year-old subjects, irrespective of the NT-proBNP level. Therefore, the absence or presence of heart failure as determined by NT-proBNP does not influence the prognostic value of low systolic blood pressure with regard to mortality in the oldest old.
Authors: Jennifer Kirsty Harrison; Veronika Van Der Wardt; Simon Paul Conroy; David J Stott; Tom Dening; Adam Lee Gordon; Pip Logan; Tomas James Welsh; Jaspal Taggar; Rowan Harwood; John R F Gladman Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jan Szewieczek; Jan Dulawa; Tomasz Francuz; Katarzyna Legierska; Beata Hornik; Iwona Włodarczyk-Sporek; Magdalena Janusz-Jenczeń; Agnieszka Batko-Szwaczka Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2014-12-23
Authors: M V B Malachias; S Ferreira; W K S B Souza; J M Ribeiro; R D Miranda; T S V Jardim Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Bert Vaes; Paulien Indestege; Tinne Serneels; Eralda Hegendörfer; Petra G van Peet; Rosalinde K E Poortvliet; Pierre Wallemacq; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Jan Degryse Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Daniela Anker; Brigitte Santos-Eggimann; Valérie Santschi; Cinzia Del Giovane; Christina Wolfson; Sven Streit; Nicolas Rodondi; Arnaud Chiolero Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2018-09-03