Literature DB >> 23247736

Needs analysis for developing a virtual-reality NOTES simulator.

Ganesh Sankaranarayanan1, Kai Matthes, Arun Nemani, Woojin Ahn, Masayuki Kato, Daniel B Jones, Steven Schwaitzberg, Suvranu De.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY AIM: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging surgical technique that requires a cautious adoption approach to ensure patient safety. High-fidelity virtual-reality-based simulators allow development of new surgical procedures and tools and train medical personnel without risk to human patients. As part of a project funded by the National Institutes of Health, we are developing the virtual transluminal endoscopic surgery trainer (VTEST) for this purpose. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured needs analysis to identify the design parameters for such a virtual-reality-based simulator for NOTES.
METHODS: A 30-point questionnaire was distributed at the 2011 National Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research meeting to obtain responses from experts. Ordinal logistic regression and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 22 NOTES experts participated in the study. Cholecystectomy (CE, 68 %) followed by appendectomy (AE, 63 %) (CE vs AE, p = 0.0521) was selected as the first choice for simulation. Flexible (FL, 47 %) and hybrid (HY, 47 %) approaches were equally favorable compared with rigid (RI, 6 %) with p < 0.001 for both FL versus RI and HY versus RI. The transvaginal approach was preferred 3 to 1 to the transgastric. Most participants preferred two-channel (2C) scopes (65 %) compared with single (1C) or three (3C) or more channels with p < 0.001 for both 2C versus 1C and 2C versus 3C. The importance of force feedback and the utility of a virtual NOTES simulator in training and testing new tools for NOTES were rated very high by the participants.
CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the importance of developing a virtual NOTES simulator and clearly presents expert preferences. The results of this analysis will direct our initial development of the VTEST platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23247736      PMCID: PMC3618859          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2637-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: new minimally invasive surgery come of age.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Ren-Xiang Huang; Zheng-Jun Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: The transvaginal route moving forward from cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Edgar Mauricio Maldonado; Jose Antonio Marzol; Franco Marinello
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

3.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.

Authors:  D Rattner; A Kalloo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: its time has come.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Soper; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-09

5.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) - scar free or scary?

Authors:  Tom Dehn; Ralph C T Austin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  NOTES: Where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  David W Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®)): a technical review.

Authors:  Edward D Auyang; Byron F Santos; Daniel H Enter; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ross S Coomber; Mikael H Sodergren; James Clark; Julian Teare; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-16

9.  Validation of a novel laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; James D Adair; Tansel Halic; Mark A Gromski; Zhonghua Lu; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The "ELITE" model: construct validation of a new training system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  S Gillen; D Wilhelm; A Meining; A Fiolka; E Doundoulakis; A Schneider; S von Delius; H Friess; H Feussner
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  9 in total

1.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): emerging trends and specifications for a virtual simulator.

Authors:  Steven D Schwaitzberg; Denis Dorozhkin; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Kai Matthes; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Graphic and haptic simulation for transvaginal cholecystectomy training in NOTES.

Authors:  Jun J Pan; Woojin Ahn; Saurabh Dargar; Tansel Halic; Bai C Li; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Kurt Roberts; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Toward scar-free surgery: an analysis of the increasing complexity from laparoscopic surgery to NOTES.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; John Romanelli; Amie Miller; David Rattner; Kurt E Roberts; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Face and content validation of a Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST™).

Authors:  Denis Dorozhkin; Arun Nemani; Kurt Roberts; Woojin Ahn; Tansel Halic; Saurabh Dargar; Jinling Wang; Caroline G L Cao; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Pre-clinical Training for New Notes Procedures: From Ex-vivo Models to Virtual Reality Simulators.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Woojin Ahn; Kai Matthes; Suvranu De
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 7.  Defining medical simulators for simulation-based education in EUS: Theoretical approach and a narrative review.

Authors:  Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.275

8.  NOViSE: a virtual natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery simulator.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Korzeniowski; Alastair Barrow; Mikael H Sodergren; Niels Hald; Fernando Bello
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Validation of NOViSE.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Korzeniowski; Daniel C Brown; Mikael H Sodergren; Alastair Barrow; Fernando Bello
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.058

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.