UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY AIM: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging surgical technique that requires a cautious adoption approach to ensure patient safety. High-fidelity virtual-reality-based simulators allow development of new surgical procedures and tools and train medical personnel without risk to human patients. As part of a project funded by the National Institutes of Health, we are developing the virtual transluminal endoscopic surgery trainer (VTEST) for this purpose. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured needs analysis to identify the design parameters for such a virtual-reality-based simulator for NOTES. METHODS: A 30-point questionnaire was distributed at the 2011 National Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research meeting to obtain responses from experts. Ordinal logistic regression and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 NOTES experts participated in the study. Cholecystectomy (CE, 68 %) followed by appendectomy (AE, 63 %) (CE vs AE, p = 0.0521) was selected as the first choice for simulation. Flexible (FL, 47 %) and hybrid (HY, 47 %) approaches were equally favorable compared with rigid (RI, 6 %) with p < 0.001 for both FL versus RI and HY versus RI. The transvaginal approach was preferred 3 to 1 to the transgastric. Most participants preferred two-channel (2C) scopes (65 %) compared with single (1C) or three (3C) or more channels with p < 0.001 for both 2C versus 1C and 2C versus 3C. The importance of force feedback and the utility of a virtual NOTES simulator in training and testing new tools for NOTES were rated very high by the participants. CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the importance of developing a virtual NOTES simulator and clearly presents expert preferences. The results of this analysis will direct our initial development of the VTEST platform.
UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY AIM: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging surgical technique that requires a cautious adoption approach to ensure patient safety. High-fidelity virtual-reality-based simulators allow development of new surgical procedures and tools and train medical personnel without risk to humanpatients. As part of a project funded by the National Institutes of Health, we are developing the virtual transluminal endoscopic surgery trainer (VTEST) for this purpose. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured needs analysis to identify the design parameters for such a virtual-reality-based simulator for NOTES. METHODS: A 30-point questionnaire was distributed at the 2011 National Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research meeting to obtain responses from experts. Ordinal logistic regression and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 NOTES experts participated in the study. Cholecystectomy (CE, 68 %) followed by appendectomy (AE, 63 %) (CE vs AE, p = 0.0521) was selected as the first choice for simulation. Flexible (FL, 47 %) and hybrid (HY, 47 %) approaches were equally favorable compared with rigid (RI, 6 %) with p < 0.001 for both FL versus RI and HY versus RI. The transvaginal approach was preferred 3 to 1 to the transgastric. Most participants preferred two-channel (2C) scopes (65 %) compared with single (1C) or three (3C) or more channels with p < 0.001 for both 2C versus 1C and 2C versus 3C. The importance of force feedback and the utility of a virtual NOTES simulator in training and testing new tools for NOTES were rated very high by the participants. CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the importance of developing a virtual NOTES simulator and clearly presents expert preferences. The results of this analysis will direct our initial development of the VTEST platform.
Authors: Edward D Auyang; Byron F Santos; Daniel H Enter; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-05-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ross S Coomber; Mikael H Sodergren; James Clark; Julian Teare; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-03-16
Authors: Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; James D Adair; Tansel Halic; Mark A Gromski; Zhonghua Lu; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S Gillen; D Wilhelm; A Meining; A Fiolka; E Doundoulakis; A Schneider; S von Delius; H Friess; H Feussner Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Steven D Schwaitzberg; Denis Dorozhkin; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Kai Matthes; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jun J Pan; Woojin Ahn; Saurabh Dargar; Tansel Halic; Bai C Li; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Kurt Roberts; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2016-03-12 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Amine Chellali; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; John Romanelli; Amie Miller; David Rattner; Kurt E Roberts; Caroline G L Cao Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Przemyslaw Korzeniowski; Alastair Barrow; Mikael H Sodergren; Niels Hald; Fernando Bello Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Przemyslaw Korzeniowski; Daniel C Brown; Mikael H Sodergren; Alastair Barrow; Fernando Bello Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.058