Literature DB >> 23247687

The β-richness of two detritivore caddisflies affects fine organic matter export.

Christopher J Patrick1, Dylan H Fernandez.   

Abstract

We used stream networks as a model system to test whether the ecosystem function, upstream production, and export of fine organic particles, an important subsidy to downstream habitats, would vary between two stream networks with identical detritivore species but different spatial distributions (i.e. high or low β-richness). Our experiment employed artificial stream networks with two simulated tributaries. We used two species of detritivorous caddisflies, Lepidostoma sp. and Pycnopsyche guttifer, in either sympatry (low β-richness) or allopatry (high β-richness) in the tributaries of each network. The tributaries were given either senesced or green speckled alder (Alnus incana rugosa). In the networks with senesced leaves, particle export was more than twice as great when the detritivores were in allopatry whereas interference competition in sympatry reduced particle export. In the networks with green leaves, particle export did not significantly vary between the allopatric and sympatric distributions because the interference competition was reduced and the two species had similar feeding rates on green leaves. Humans are altering β-richness by homogenizing or differentiating flora and fauna across habitats; however, little is known about how altering this type of biodiversity will affect ecosystem functions. Our experimental manipulation is a simple version of a change in the β-richness of the detritivores in a more complex stream network in nature. These results may indicate that shifts in species distributions across sites may significantly affect ecosystem functions, even when no species are lost from a watershed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23247687     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2550-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

Review 1.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; Margaret A Palmer; Scott L Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Simulating species loss following perturbation: assessing the effects on process rates.

Authors:  Micael Jonsson; Olivier Dangles; Björn Malmqvist; Francois Guérold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Patch dynamics, persistence, and species coexistence in metaecosystems.

Authors:  Dominique Gravel; Nicolas Mouquet; Michel Loreau; Frédéric Guichard
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems.

Authors:  Tadashi Fukami; David A Wardle; Peter J Bellingham; Christa P H Mulder; David R Towns; Gregor W Yeates; Karen I Bonner; Melody S Durrett; Madeline N Grant-Hoffman; Wendy M Williamson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  The role of exotic species in homogenizing the North American flora.

Authors:  Hong Qian; Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Predators temper the relative importance of stochastic processes in the assembly of prey metacommunities.

Authors:  Jonathan M Chase; Elizabeth G Biro; Wade A Ryberg; Kevin G Smith
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs.

Authors:  Jarrett E Byrnes; John J Stachowicz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecosystem multifunctionality increases with beta diversity in restored prairies.

Authors:  Emily Grman; Chad R Zirbel; Tyler Bassett; Lars A Brudvig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.