Literature DB >> 23246739

Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy and decompression in the cervical spine.

Cort D Lawton1, Zachary A Smith1, Sandi K Lam2, Ali Habib1, Ricky H M Wong2, Richard G Fessler3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few reports have addressed long-term outcomes, as well as the safety and efficacy of the cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy (CMEF) and cervical microendoscopic diskectomy (CMED) procedures used in modern spine practice to treat degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Accordingly, we present long-term outcomes from a cohort of patients treated for foraminal stenosis or disk herniation with the CMEF or CMED procedure, respectively.
METHODS: A total of 38 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 24.47 ± 12.84 months. Patients were monitored prospectively with questionnaires consisting of a visual analog scale for the neck (VASN) and arm (VASA), and a neck disability index (NDI) form. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospitalization stay also were collected. Data were analyzed with Microsoft Office Excel 2007.
RESULTS: The mean 1 year follow-up scores all showed statistically significant improvements: NDI (P = 0.0019), VASN (P = 0.0017), VASA (P ≤ 0.0001). Similar results were seen at 2-year follow-up: NDI (P = 0.0011), VASN (P = 0.0022), and VASA (P ≤ 0.0001); and at 3- to 6-year follow-up: NDI (P = 0.0015), VASN (P = 0.0200), and VASA (P = 0.0034). The average operation time, hospitalization stay, and estimated blood loss were 154.27 ± 26.79 minutes, 21.22 ± 14.23 hours, and 27.92 mL, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences when patients were compared by age (over 50 vs. under 50), operative level (above C6 vs. below C6), or sex. One complication was reported in this study consisting of duratomy, which required no further intervention.
CONCLUSION: Posterior CMEF and CMED are safe and effective procedures for minimally invasive decompression in the cervical spine.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraminotomy; Microendoscopic; Microendoscopic decompression; Microendoscopic diskectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246739     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  13 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Myeong Hwan Shon; Yoon Jae Seong; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zou; Ping-Chuan Wang; Hao Chen; Xin-Min Feng; Hui-Hui Sun
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Microsurgery or open cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review.

Authors:  Zhaojun Song; Zhi Zhang; Jie Hao; Jieliang Shen; Nian Zhou; Shengxi Xu; Weidong Ni; Zhenming Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Young-Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Pawel Glowka; Robert J Blok; Mark C Gillespy; Mukund I Gundanna; William D Smith; Zeshan Hyder; Bruce M McCormack
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Yong Ahn; Gun Choi; J N A Gibson; S Ruetten; Yue Zhou; Zhen Zhou Li; Christoph J Siepe; Ralf Wagner; Jun-Ho Lee; Koichi Sairyo; Kyung Chul Choi; Chien-Min Chen; A E Telfeian; Xifeng Zhang; Arun Banhot; Pramod V Lokhande; N Prada; Jian Shen; F C Cortinas; N P Brooks; Peter Van Daele; Vit Kotheeranurak; Saqib Hasan; Gun Keorochana; Mohammed Assous; Roger Härtl; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of the adjacent segments after minimally invasive cervical surgeries versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element study.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Chen-Xi Yuchi; Ziwei Gao; Xinlong Ma; Dong Zhao; Jun-Wei Li; Baoshan Xu; Chun-Qiu Zhang; Zheng Wang; Cheng-Fei Du; Qiang Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Complications of minimally invasive, tubular access surgery for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Donald A Ross
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-07-07

9.  Posterior Percutaneous Transpedicular Endoscopic Approach for Treating Single-Segment Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Ke-Xiao Yu; Wei-Zhong Lu; Chang-Ming Xiao; Lei Chu; Rui Deng; Liang Chen; Zhong-Liang Deng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy as a new treatment for cervical radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yangyang Zhang; Zhihua Ouyang; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.