Literature DB >> 23246286

Assessing clinical judgment using the Script Concordance test: the importance of using specialty-specific experts to develop the scoring key.

Andrea M Petrucci1, Thamer Nouh, Marylise Boutros, Robert Gagnon, Sarkis H Meterissian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) assesses clinical judgment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a specialty-specific scoring key improves the validity of the SCT.
METHODS: Thirty experts from 6 general surgery disciplines answered questions pertaining to their area of expertise. We created a scoring key of 5 amalgamated expert panel members. The answers of 227 general surgery residents were analyzed.
RESULTS: The optimized test had a reliability level (Cronbach α) of .81. Scores increased progressively throughout all levels of training, with R5s scoring higher than R4s (R1, 42.7 ± 7.1; R2, 47.6 ± 7.5; R3, 48.7 ± 6.7; R4, 49.8 ± 7.7; R5, 52.9 ± 9.3). The average score of juniors (R1s + R2s, 45.1 ± 7.6) was significantly lower (P < .001) than seniors (R3s + R4s + R5s, 50.4 ± 8.0).
CONCLUSIONS: We showed that specialty-specific experts must be used to develop the scoring key. This has important implications in the application of the SCT on a wider level.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246286     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the first year of Dental Health Partnerships: a web-based distance learning partnership between UK dental educators and students from low-resource countries.

Authors:  S Abdul-Razzak
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Construction and utilization of a script concordance test as an assessment tool for DCEM3 (5th year) medical students in rheumatology.

Authors:  Sylvain Mathieu; Marion Couderc; Baptiste Glace; Anne Tournadre; Sandrine Malochet-Guinamand; Bruno Pereira; Jean-Jacques Dubost; Martin Soubrier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Challenging script concordance test reference standard by evidence: do judgments by emergency medicine consultants agree with likelihood ratios?

Authors:  Seyed-Foad Ahmadi; Shahin Khoshkish; Kamran Soltani-Arabshahi; Peyman Hafezi-Moghadam; Golara Zahmatkesh; Parisa Heidari; Davood Baba-Beigloo; Hamid R Baradaran; Shahram Lotfipour
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Nurses' Clinical Judgment Development: A Qualitative Research in Iran.

Authors:  Jamal Seidi; Fatemeh Alhani; Mahvash Salsali
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Educators and practitioners' perspectives in the development of a learning by concordance tool for medical clerkship in the context of the COVID pandemic.

Authors:  Marie-France Deschênes; Bernard Charlin; Véronique Phan; Geneviève Grégoire; Tania Riendeau; Margaret Henri; Aurore Fehlmann; Ahmed Moussa
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-12-29

6.  Evaluation of the first year of the Oxpal Medlink: A web-based partnership designed to address specific challenges facing medical education in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Authors:  Rose S Penfold; Mohammad A Ali; Adam M Ali; Ishita Patel; Thomas MacGregor; Sushma Shankar; Thomas J Cahill; Alexander Et Finlayson; Imran Mahmud
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2014-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.