Literature DB >> 23246069

Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts.

Ben Machol1, Sarah Rizk.   

Abstract

Fossil fuel energy has several externalities not accounted for in the retail price, including associated adverse human health impacts, future costs from climate change, and other environmental damages. Here, we quantify the economic value of health impacts associated with PM(2.5) and PM(2.5) precursors (NO(x) and SO(2)) on a per kilowatt hour basis. We provide figures based on state electricity profiles, national averages and fossil fuel type. We find that the economic value of improved human health associated with avoiding emissions from fossil fuel electricity in the United States ranges from a low of $0.005-$0.013/kWh in California to a high of $0.41-$1.01/kWh in Maryland. When accounting for the adverse health impacts of imported electricity, the California figure increases to $0.03-$0.07/kWh. Nationally, the average economic value of health impacts associated with fossil fuel usage is $0.14-$0.35/kWh. For coal, oil, and natural gas, respectively, associated economic values of health impacts are $0.19-$0.45/kWh, $0.08-$0.19/kWh, and $0.01-$0.02/kWh. For coal and oil, these costs are larger than the typical retail price of electricity, demonstrating the magnitude of the externality. When the economic value of health impacts resulting from air emissions is considered, our analysis suggests that on average, U.S. consumers of electricity should be willing to pay $0.24-$0.45/kWh for alternatives such as energy efficiency investments or emission-free renewable sources that avoid fossil fuel combustion. The economic value of health impacts is approximately an order of magnitude larger than estimates of the social cost of carbon for fossil fuel electricity. In total, we estimate that the economic value of health impacts from fossil fuel electricity in the United States is $361.7-886.5 billion annually, representing 2.5-6.0% of the national GDP. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246069     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  10 in total

1.  The relationship between renewable energy use and health expenditures in EU countries.

Authors:  Mahmut Unsal Sasmaz; Aysun Karamıklı; Ulas Akkucuk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-05-05

2.  Energy consumption habits and human health nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Imran Hanif
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Beyond black lung: scientific evidence of health effects from coal use in electricity generation.

Authors:  Susan Buchanan; Erica Burt; Peter Orris
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  'Under the Dome' on Chinese air pollution, a documentary by Chai Jing.

Authors:  Diana S Powers
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  On the causal links between health indicator, output, combustible renewables and waste consumption, rail transport, and CO2 emissions: the case of Tunisia.

Authors:  Mehdi Ben Jebli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Pollution from Fossil-Fuel Combustion is the Leading Environmental Threat to Global Pediatric Health and Equity: Solutions Exist.

Authors:  Frederica Perera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Transmission Channels and Impacts of Energy Use on Health Outcomes in Asia.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Minjuan Chen; Jinbao Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  Economics of planning electricity transmission considering environmental and health externalities.

Authors:  Bowen Yi; Shaohui Zhang; Ying Fan
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 9.  A Review on the Valorization of Macroalgal Wastes for Biomethane Production.

Authors:  Yann Nicolas Barbot; Hashem Al-Ghaili; Roland Benz
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel B Howard; Jesse Thé; Rafael Soria; Neal Fann; Roberto Schaeffer; Jean-Daniel M Saphores
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 9.621

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.