Literature DB >> 23245636

Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for ADHD treatment with stimulants using discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway.

Anna H Glenngård1, Jonas Hjelmgren, Per Hove Thomsen, Torbjörn Tvedten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice between different attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications depends on different drug attributes. Economic evaluations of drugs often disregard the utility of other attributes compare with the drugs' efficacy. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess patient's preferences and elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) for different drug attributes in the treatment of ADHD.
METHODS: 285 patients (117 parents for children below 15 years, 52 adolescents 15-17 years and 116 adults aged 18 years and above) from Sweden, Denmark and Norway completed a questionnaire concerning their ADHD drug treatment, and answered questions on their preferences using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Included attributes were effectiveness, side-effects, dosing and price.
RESULTS: Effectiveness was the most important attribute, followed by side-effects and the number of dosings per day (all P < 0.001). The estimated monthly WTP for a drug generating full effectiveness, no side-effects and once-daily dosing was €790 for adolescents and €360 for adults. The estimated WTP for ADHD drugs with characteristics similar to existing drugs on the market was higher or in line with market prices (€37-180 for adolescents and €16-80 for adults). Regarding experience with current treatment, 19% of all patients in the study reported good functioning during the morning, day and evening.
CONCLUSIONS: The gap between the monetary valuation of existing products and an optimally valued product suggest that there is room for improvements in the clinical management of ADHD. The results suggest that DCE is a method that can be used to value not only hypothetical scenarios but also can be used to value and distinguish between real-life scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23245636     DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2012.748825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0803-9488            Impact factor:   2.202


  16 in total

1.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A Latent Class Analysis to Identify Variation in Caregivers' Preferences for their Child's Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment: Do Stated Preferences Match Current Treatment?

Authors:  Xinyi Ng; John F P Bridges; Melissa M Ross; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Caregiver Treatment Preferences for Children with a New Versus Existing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Alex Park; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; Ellen M Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 5.  Extended-release methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

Authors:  Kim Boesen; Asger Sand Paludan-Müller; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 6.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Gillian R Currie; Bryanne L Kennedy; Karen V MacDonald; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Eliciting preferences for continuing medication among adult patients and parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Khan; Camila Balbontin; Michiel C J Bliemer; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Adult Patient Preferences for Long-Acting ADHD Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  M Janelle Cambron-Mellott; Jaromir Mikl; Joana E Matos; Jennifer G Erensen; Kathleen Beusterien; Marc J Cataldo; Bernadette Hallissey; Gregory W Mattingly
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents - assessment of adverse events in non-randomised studies.

Authors:  Ole Jakob Storebø; Nadia Pedersen; Erica Ramstad; Maja Lærke Kielsholm; Signe Sofie Nielsen; Helle B Krogh; Carlos R Moreira-Maia; Frederik L Magnusson; Mathilde Holmskov; Trine Gerner; Maria Skoog; Susanne Rosendal; Camilla Groth; Donna Gillies; Kirsten Buch Rasmussen; Dorothy Gauci; Morris Zwi; Richard Kirubakaran; Sasja J Håkonsen; Lise Aagaard; Erik Simonsen; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.