Carl van Walraven1, Alan J Forster. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ASB1-003 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada. carlv@ohri.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hospitals have strong incentives to decrease readmission rates. Not all hospital readmissions are potentially avoidable. Therefore, only a component of all hospital readmissions can be influenced by interventions designed to decrease them. In this study, we determined how effective interventions must be to attain specific reductions in hospital readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A conceptual model of all readmissions and potentially avoidable readmissions was used to derive a mathematical relationship between the relative reduction in the total number of readmissions, the relative reduction in potentially avoidable readmissions, and the proportion of readmissions that are potentially avoidable. RESULTS: When 22% of readmissions were potentially avoidable, achieving a 20% reduction in the total number of readmissions required a 91% reduction in potentially avoidable readmissions; decreasing potentially avoidable readmissions by 20% reduced total readmissions by 4.4%. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that relative reductions in the total number of readmissions are notably lower than that for potentially avoidable readmissions. This separation in relative reduction of all and potentially avoidable readmissions increases as the proportion of readmissions deemed potentially avoidable decreases. These results have important implications for health care planners and researchers.
OBJECTIVES: Hospitals have strong incentives to decrease readmission rates. Not all hospital readmissions are potentially avoidable. Therefore, only a component of all hospital readmissions can be influenced by interventions designed to decrease them. In this study, we determined how effective interventions must be to attain specific reductions in hospital readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A conceptual model of all readmissions and potentially avoidable readmissions was used to derive a mathematical relationship between the relative reduction in the total number of readmissions, the relative reduction in potentially avoidable readmissions, and the proportion of readmissions that are potentially avoidable. RESULTS: When 22% of readmissions were potentially avoidable, achieving a 20% reduction in the total number of readmissions required a 91% reduction in potentially avoidable readmissions; decreasing potentially avoidable readmissions by 20% reduced total readmissions by 4.4%. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that relative reductions in the total number of readmissions are notably lower than that for potentially avoidable readmissions. This separation in relative reduction of all and potentially avoidable readmissions increases as the proportion of readmissions deemed potentially avoidable decreases. These results have important implications for health care planners and researchers.
Authors: Andrew D Auerbach; Sunil Kripalani; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Neil Sehgal; Peter K Lindenauer; Joshua P Metlay; Grant Fletcher; Gregory W Ruhnke; Scott A Flanders; Christopher Kim; Mark V Williams; Larissa Thomas; Vernon Giang; Shoshana J Herzig; Kanan Patel; W John Boscardin; Edmondo J Robinson; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Julia G Lavenberg; Brian Leas; Craig A Umscheid; Kendal Williams; David R Goldmann; Sunil Kripalani Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Elizabeth J Austin; Jen Neukirch; Thuan D Ong; Louise Simpson; Gabrielle N Berger; Carolyn Sy Keller; David R Flum; Elaine Giusti; Jennifer Azen; Giana H Davidson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 5.128