Literature DB >> 2324558

Cancer pain management according to WHO analgesic guidelines.

S A Schug, D Zech, U Dörr.   

Abstract

On admission to a pain management unit, 92.5% of 174 cancer patients suffered from more than moderate pain despite prior treatment. This inefficacy was mainly due to underdosage of drugs, inadequate intake schedule, and hesitation to use strong opioids. Following introduction of an oral drug therapy based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, more than 80% of all patients described their pain as ranging between "none" and "moderate" on a six-step verbal rating scale at all times. To obtain these results, it was necessary to adapt the therapy to increasing pain in the course of terminal disease. Step III (strong opioids) gained more and more importance with time, and step I (nonopioids) was finally useful only in a minority of patients. Side effects played a minor role as a reason to change therapy. Oral drug therapy following these guidelines led to sufficient pain control in most patients over the whole study period (7,400 days); only 11% of the patients required other methods of pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2324558     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  29 in total

1.  Trajectories of pain and analgesics in oncology outpatients with metastatic bone pain during participation in a psychoeducational intervention study to improve pain management.

Authors:  Dale J Langford; Steven M Paul; Debu Tripathy; Claudia West; Marylin J Dodd; Karen Schumacher; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Clinicians' practice and attitudes toward cancer pain management in Korea.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Jeon; Hoon Kyo Kim; Charles S Cleeland; Xin Shelley Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  [WHO step II-clinical reality or a didactic instrument?].

Authors:  R Freynhagen; M Zenz; M Strumpf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Responsible prescribing of opioids for the management of chronic pain.

Authors:  Bruce Nicholson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of cancer-related pain: "back to the origins".

Authors:  Artemus Flagg; Kai McGreevy; Kayode Williams
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-08

Review 6.  Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review.

Authors:  Cathy L Carlson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  An open-label, 1-year extension study of the long-term safety and efficacy of once-daily OROS(R) hydromorphone in patients with chronic cancer pain.

Authors:  Magdi Hanna; Alberto Tuca; John Thipphawong
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Interventional pain management: need of the hour for cancer pain patients.

Authors:  Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  Cancer-induced oxidative stress and pain.

Authors:  Mina G Nashed; Matthew D Balenko; Gurmit Singh
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

10.  Opioid therapy in patients with a history of substance abuse.

Authors:  Steven D Passik; Kenneth L Kirsh
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.