Literature DB >> 23245222

Behavioral and neural correlates of loss aversion and risk avoidance in adolescents and adults.

Emily E Barkley-Levenson1, Linda Van Leijenhorst, Adriana Galván.   

Abstract

Individuals are frequently faced with risky decisions involving the potential for both gain and loss. Exploring the role of both potential gains and potential losses in predicting risk taking is critical to understanding how adolescents and adults make the choice to engage in or avoid a real-life risk. This study aimed to examine the impact of potential losses as well as gains on adolescent decisions during risky choice in a laboratory task. Adolescent (n=18) and adult (n=16) participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a mixed gambles task, and completed questionnaires measuring real-world risk-taking behaviors. While potential loss had a significantly greater effect on choice than potential gain in both adolescents and adults and there were no behavioral group differences on the task, adolescents recruited significantly more frontostriatal circuitry than adults when choosing to reject a gamble. During risk-seeking behavior, adolescent activation in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was negatively correlated with self-reported likelihood of risk taking. During risk-avoidant behavior, mPFC activation of in adults was negatively correlated with self-reported benefits of risk-taking. Taken together, these findings reflect different neural patterns during risk-taking and risk-avoidant behaviors in adolescents and adults.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23245222     DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1878-9293            Impact factor:   6.464


  37 in total

1.  Neural Interaction Between Risk Sensitivity and Cognitive Control Predicting Health Risk Behaviors Among Late Adolescents.

Authors:  Jungmeen Kim-Spoon; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Julee P Farley; Pearl H Chiu; Warren K Bickel; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 2.  Developmental perspectives on risky and impulsive choice.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The role of the anterior insula in adolescent decision making.

Authors:  Ashley R Smith; Laurence Steinberg; Jason Chein
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain.

Authors:  Emily Barkley-Levenson; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Novel insights from the Yellow Light Game: Safe and risky decisions differentially impact adolescent outcome-related brain function.

Authors:  Zdeňa A Op de Macks; Jessica E Flannery; Shannon J Peake; John C Flournoy; Arian Mobasser; Sarah L Alberti; Philip A Fisher; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Reward-centricity and attenuated aversions: An adolescent phenotype emerging from studies in laboratory animals.

Authors:  Tamara L Doremus-Fitzwater; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Using the Risk-Return Model to Explain Gambling Disorder Symptoms in Youth: An Empirical Investigation with Italian Adolescents.

Authors:  Maria Anna Donati; Joshua Weller; Caterina Primi
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2021-01-03

8.  The Influences of Described and Experienced Information on Adolescent Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Vinod Venkatraman; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2017-10-19

9.  Adolescents adapt more slowly than adults to varying reward contingencies.

Authors:  Amir Homayoun Javadi; Dirk H K Schmidt; Michael N Smolka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood.

Authors:  David Pagliaccio; Katherine R Luking; Andrey P Anokhin; Ian H Gotlib; Elizabeth P Hayden; Thomas M Olino; Chun-Zi Peng; Greg Hajcak; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.