Literature DB >> 23244802

A multigene prognostic assay for selection of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T3, stage II colon cancer: impact on quality-adjusted life expectancy and costs.

John Hornberger1, Gary H Lyman, Rebecca Chien, Neal J Meropol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Uncertainty exists regarding appropriate and affordable use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer (T3, proficient DNA mismatch repair). This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness and costs from a US societal perspective of a multigene recurrence score (RS) assay for patients recently diagnosed with stage II colon cancer (T3, proficient DNA mismatch repair) eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: RS was compared with guideline-recommended clinicopathological factors (tumor stage, lymph nodes examined, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion) by using a state-transition (Markov) lifetime model. Data were obtained from published literature, a randomized controlled trial (QUick And Simple And Reliable) of adjuvant chemotherapy, and rates of chemotherapy use from the National Cooperative Cancer Network Colon/Rectum Cancer Outcomes study. Life-years, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime costs were examined.
RESULTS: The RS is projected to reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use by 17% compared with current treatment patterns and to increase quality-adjusted life expectancy by an average of 0.035 years. Direct medical costs are expected to decrease by an average of $2971 per patient. The assay was cost saving for all subgroups of patients stratified by clinicopathologic factors. The most influential variables affecting treatment decisions were projected years of life remaining, recurrence score, and patients' disutilities associated with adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the multigene RS to assess recurrence risk after surgery in stage II colon cancer (T3, proficient DNA mismatch repair) may reduce the use of adjuvant chemotherapy without decreasing quality-adjusted life expectancy and be cost saving from a societal perspective. These findings need to be validated in additional cohorts, including studies of clinical practice as assay use diffuses into nonacademic settings.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23244802     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  11 in total

1.  Current status of gene expression profiling to assist decision making in stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  Cheng E Chee; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-05-28

2.  Oncotype DX testing does not affect clinical practice in stage IIa colon cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin G Allar; Evangelos Messaris; Vitaliy Y Poylin; Benjamin L Schlechter; Thomas E Cataldo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  CDX2 Biomarker Testing and Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Deborah Schrag; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Girdin (GIV) Expression as a Prognostic Marker of Recurrence in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Stage II Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Pradipta Ghosh; Jeanne Tie; Andrea Muranyi; Shalini Singh; Patrick Brunhoeber; Katherine Leith; Rebecca Bowermaster; Zhiming Liao; Yifei Zhu; Bonnie LaFleur; Ben Tran; Jayesh Desai; Ian Jones; Matthew Croxford; Rodrigo Jover; Ajay Goel; Paul Waring; Song Hu; Volker Teichgraber; Ulrich-Peter Rohr; Ruediger Ridder; Kandavel Shanmugam; Peter Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Evaluating the clinical impact of a genomic classifier in prostate cancer using individualized decision analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Mason Lobo; Adam P Dicker; Christine Buerki; Elai Daviconi; R Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Jenkins; Nirav Patel; Robert B Den; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparative economics of a 12-gene assay for predicting risk of recurrence in stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  Steven R Alberts; Tiffany M Yu; Robert J Behrens; Lindsay A Renfro; Geetika Srivastava; Gamini S Soori; Shaker R Dakhil; Rex B Mowat; John P Kuebler; George P Kim; Miroslaw A Mazurczak; John Hornberger
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Vanessa N Sturz; Timothy N Showalter; Jennifer M Lobo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Establishment of a 12-gene expression signature to predict colon cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Dalong Sun; Jing Chen; Longzi Liu; Guangxi Zhao; Pingping Dong; Bingrui Wu; Jun Wang; Ling Dong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group.

Authors:  Ketan Badani; Darby J S Thompson; Christine Buerki; Elai Davicioni; Jill Garrison; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Anirban P Mitra; Penelope J Wood; John Hornberger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.