Literature DB >> 23244729

Methods for in vivo molecular imaging.

A A Kuchmiy1, G A Efimov, S A Nedospasov.   

Abstract

Visualization of single molecules and specific subsets of cells is widely used for studies of biological processes and particularly in immunological research. Recent technological advances have provided a qualitative change in biological visualization from studying of "snapshot" pictures to real-time continuous observation of cellular dynamics in vivo. Contemporary methods of in vivo imaging make it possible to localize specific cells within organs and tissues, to study their differentiation, migration, and cell-to-cell interactions, and to follow some intracellular events. Fluorescence intravital microscopy plays an especially important role in high resolution molecular imaging. The methods of intravital microscopy are quickly advancing thanks to improvements in molecular sensors, labeling strategies, and detection approaches. Novel techniques allow simultaneous detection of various probes with better resolution and depth of imaging. In this review, we describe current methods for in vivo imaging, with special accent on fluorescence approaches, and discuss their applications for medical and biological studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23244729     DOI: 10.1134/S0006297912120012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)        ISSN: 0006-2979            Impact factor:   2.487


  6 in total

1.  Automated multicolor mesoscopic imaging for the 3-dimensional reconstruction of fluorescent biomarker distribution in large tissue specimens.

Authors:  Wanling Foo; Alexander Wiede; Sebastian Bierwirth; Rainer Heintzmann; Adrian T Press; Walter Hauswald
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 2.  Cancer stratification by molecular imaging.

Authors:  Justus Weber; Uwe Haberkorn; Walter Mier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Concise review: workshop review: understanding and assessing the risks of stem cell-based therapies.

Authors:  James A Heslop; Thomas G Hammond; Ilaria Santeramo; Agnès Tort Piella; Isabel Hopp; Jing Zhou; Roua Baty; Enrique I Graziano; Bernabé Proto Marco; Alexis Caron; Patrik Sköld; Peter W Andrews; Melissa A Baxter; David C Hay; Junnat Hamdam; Michaela E Sharpe; Sara Patel; David R Jones; Jens Reinhardt; Erik H J Danen; Uri Ben-David; Glyn Stacey; Petter Björquist; Jacqueline Piner; John Mills; Cliff Rowe; Giovanni Pellegrini; Swaminathan Sethu; Daniel J Antoine; Michael J Cross; Patricia Murray; Dominic P Williams; Neil R Kitteringham; Chris E P Goldring; B Kevin Park
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  The use of the NIS reporter gene for optimizing oncolytic virotherapy.

Authors:  Amber Miller; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of oncolytic viral therapy.

Authors:  Dana Haddad; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 7.200

Review 6.  Virotheranostics, a double-barreled viral gun pointed toward cancer; ready to shoot?

Authors:  Mohsen Keshavarz; Ailar Sabbaghi; Seyed Mohammad Miri; Abolhasan Rezaeyan; Yaser Arjeini; Amir Ghaemi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.722

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.