| Literature DB >> 23244640 |
Renee E Magnan1, Amber R Köblitz, Kevin D McCaul, Amanda J Dillard.
Abstract
Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we sought to determine whether differences in reporting would exist for smokers who self-monitored their smoking-related negative thoughts five times daily in comparison to a non-EMA control group. One hundred seventeen smokers were randomly assigned to two conditions. Eighty-eight smokers carried personal digital assistants (PDAs) for 2 weeks and monitored negative thoughts each day, and 29 smokers did not self-monitor their negative thoughts. All smokers completed pretest and posttest assessments reporting their perceived risk and worry associated with smoking consequences. The data revealed evidence of self-monitoring effects, as smokers in the EMA condition reported less worry after 2 weeks of self-monitoring compared to smokers in the control condition. The two conditions did not differ in their reports of perceived risk of smoking consequences. These data suggest that EMA procedures asking respondents to self-monitor their thoughts about smoking may influence feelings about their smoking behavior. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23244640 PMCID: PMC3800184 DOI: 10.1037/a0031232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Assess ISSN: 1040-3590