| Literature DB >> 23244453 |
Hein Sprong1, Agnetha Hofhuis, Fedor Gassner, Willem Takken, Frans Jacobs, Arnold J H van Vliet, Marijn van Ballegooijen, Joke van der Giessen, Katsuhisa Takumi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Between 1994 and 2009, a threefold increase has been observed in consultations of general practitioners for tick bites and Lyme disease in The Netherlands. The objective of this study was to determine whether an increase in the number of questing ticks infected with B. burgdorferi sensu lato is a potential cause of the rise in Lyme disease incidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23244453 PMCID: PMC3562265 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Areas in The Netherlands in 2000 – 2008 categorized according to three levels of probable tick densities
| High | 4399 km2 | 4483 km2 | 5246 km2 | 19% |
| Low | 15608 km2 | 15517 km2 | 15645 km2 | 1% |
| Zero | 13744 km2 | 13755 km2 | 12652 km2 | −8% |
Figure 1Bird population densities 1980–2008. Dots represent population index values of each bird species per year. The bird population index was calculated by dividing the number of a bird species each year by the number of that bird species in the baseline year in 1990 and multiplying the result by 100. Lines represent the best-fit negative binomial distribution with the mean (solid) and the 95% confidence interval (dashed).
Figure 2Change in the number of Barn owl () 1990 – 2006. The change in the number of Barn owl was calculated by dividing the number of barn owls each year by the number in the baseline year 1990 and multiplying the result by 100. The solid line is the best fit exponential function.
Figure 3Roe deer population densities and questing tick abundance. Horizontal axis is the local population density of Roe deer at all fourteen study sites in 2008. Vertical axis is the peak number of questing ticks at the corresponding study sites in 2009. The solid line is the best generalized-linear-model fit.
Estimates for the parameters in the model describing the densities of questing larval, nymphal and adult 2006 – 2009
| Bilthoven | 3.4 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.07 |
| Eijsden | 10.7 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 1.1 | 0.08 |
| Kwade hoek | 3.5 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 0.4 | 1.00 |
| Montferland | 25.2 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 0.4 | 0.09 |
| Twiske | 22.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 0.30 |
| Vaals | 10.0 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.2 | 0.64 |
| Veldhoven | 32.8 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 0.7 | 0.11 |
Increasing trends are indicated by positive estimates for the coefficient b in the linear function (Experimental procedures), decreasing trends by negative estimates. Baseline is equal to the intercept a in the linear function describing the tick density/activity per drag area. Population trend is the change in tick density/activity per year; it is equal to the coefficient b in the linear function multiplied by 2π. Peak month is equal to the parameter τ in the cosine function describing the annual seasonality. Tick aggregation is equal to the parameter k in the negative binomial distribution. Estimates are maximum likelihood estimates for each sampling location. Study sites with significant trends are shown in bold.
Estimates for the parameters in the model describing the densities of questing nymphal plus adult 2006 – 2009
| Bilthoven | 2.2 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 1.00 |
| Ede | 20.4 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 1.9 | 1.00 |
| Eijsden | 10.5 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 1.1 | 0.07 |
| Gieten | 8.5 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 1.9 | 0.61 |
| Kwade hoek | 3.5 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 0.4 | 1.00 |
| Montferland | 11.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 0.6 | 0.08 |
| Schiermonnikoog | 2.5 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 1.00 |
| Twiske | 11.2 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 1.00 |
| Vaals | 5.6 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.3 | 1.00 |
| Veldhoven | 20.8 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 1.1 | 1.00 |
See the legend for Table 1.
Figure 4Numbers of questing ticks at Duin and Kruidberg 2000 – 2009. The population of larvae is shown in panel A. The population of nymphs plus adults is shown in panel B. A dot represents the number of ticks collected per drag (100 m2). Shaded area represents the best-fit for negative binomial distributions with the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 5Skyline plot of and populations. Changes in coalescent population sizes over years are shown in solid lines indicating B. afzelii (panel A) and B. garinii (panel B). Dashed lines enclose 95% credible interval.