Louise Gustafsson1, Kerryn Bootle. 1. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. l.gustafsson@uq.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to enhance our understanding of the transition experience for clients with stroke and their carers during discharge and the first month at home. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five clients with stroke and their carers (n = 5) at 1 month after discharge from stroke rehabilitation. Questioning in the interviews explored preparation for and the experience of the transition. Inductive thematic analysis was completed with the client and carer interviews and the resultant themes were compared. Basic demographic data were collected to allow description of the participants. RESULTS: Five clients and five carers were interviewed 1 month after discharge to home. The analysis of the client interviews yielded three themes including: rehabilitation was okay, it's a struggle, and supports and assistance. The carer interviews also yielded three themes including: the purpose of rehabilitation, life is different now, and looking to the future. CONCLUSIONS: The clients and the carers all spoke of the positive aspects of rehabilitation but raised concerns about the limited ability to undertake daily tasks regularly and develop personalised routines in preparation for discharge. The daily routines at home were disrupted with clients taking longer to complete daily activities and carers juggling caring responsibilities with their own lifestyle. Overall, the results suggest that there is a need for stroke rehabilitation services to better prepare the clients and carers for transition to home.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to enhance our understanding of the transition experience for clients with stroke and their carers during discharge and the first month at home. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five clients with stroke and their carers (n = 5) at 1 month after discharge from stroke rehabilitation. Questioning in the interviews explored preparation for and the experience of the transition. Inductive thematic analysis was completed with the client and carer interviews and the resultant themes were compared. Basic demographic data were collected to allow description of the participants. RESULTS: Five clients and five carers were interviewed 1 month after discharge to home. The analysis of the client interviews yielded three themes including: rehabilitation was okay, it's a struggle, and supports and assistance. The carer interviews also yielded three themes including: the purpose of rehabilitation, life is different now, and looking to the future. CONCLUSIONS: The clients and the carers all spoke of the positive aspects of rehabilitation but raised concerns about the limited ability to undertake daily tasks regularly and develop personalised routines in preparation for discharge. The daily routines at home were disrupted with clients taking longer to complete daily activities and carers juggling caring responsibilities with their own lifestyle. Overall, the results suggest that there is a need for stroke rehabilitation services to better prepare the clients and carers for transition to home.
Authors: Shilpa Krishnan; Monique R Pappadis; Susan C Weller; Marsja Stearnes; Amit Kumar; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Timothy A Reistetter Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Tamilyn Bakas; Nenette M Jessup; Susan M McLennon; Barbara Habermann; Michael T Weaver; Gwendolyn Morrison Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Amber M Angell; Leah Goodman; Heather R Walker; Katherine E McDonald; Lewis E Kraus; Edward H J Elms; Lex Frieden; Alisa Jordan Sheth; Joy Hammel Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2020 Jul/Aug
Authors: Remedios López-Liria; Francisco Antonio Vega-Ramírez; Patricia Rocamora-Pérez; José Manuel Aguilar-Parra; David Padilla-Góngora Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mathew J Reeves; Anne K Hughes; Amanda T Woodward; Paul P Freddolino; Constantinos K Coursaris; Sarah J Swierenga; Lee H Schwamm; Michele C Fritz Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Maria Flink; Sebastian Lindblom; Malin Tistad; Ann Charlotte Laska; Bo Christer Bertilsson; Carmen Wärlinge; Jan Hasselström; Marie Elf; Lena von Koch; Charlotte Ytterberg Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 2.692