Literature DB >> 23244122

Markov's modeling for screening strategies for colorectal cancer.

Mohsen Barouni1, Mohammad Hassan Larizadeh, Asma Sabermahani, Hossien Ghaderi.   

Abstract

Economic decision models are being increasingly used to assess medical interventions. Advances in this field are mainly due to enhanced processing capacity of computers, availability of specific software to perform the necessary tasks, and refined mathematical techniques. We here estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of ten strategies for colon cancer screening, as well as no screening, incorporating quality of life, noncompliance and data on the costs and profit of chemotherapy in Iran. We used a Markov model to measure the costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy of a 50-year-old average-risk Iranian without screening and with screening by each test. In this paper, we tested the model with data from the Ministry of Health and published literature. We considered costs from the perspective of a health insurance organization, with inflation to 2011, the Iranian Rial being converted into US dollars. We focused on three tests for the 10 strategies considered currently being used for population screening in some Iranians provinces (Kerman, Golestan Mazandaran, Ardabil, and Tehran): low-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test, performed annually; fecal immunochemical test, performed annually; and colonoscopy, performed every 10 years. These strategies reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer by 39%, 60% and 76%, and mortality by 50%, 69% and 78%, respectively, compared with no screening. These approaches generated ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios) of $9067, $654 and $8700 per QALY (quality-adjusted life year), respectively. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the influence of various scales on the economic evaluation of screening. The results were sensitive to probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Colonoscopy every ten years yielded the greatest net health value. Screening for colon cancer is economical and cost-effective over conventional levels of WTP8.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23244122     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.10.5125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  6 in total

1.  Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results.

Authors:  Yin-Wen Cheng; Ying-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Mismeasured Covariate in the Long-Term Survival of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Seyyed Vahid Hosseini; Soheila Khodakarim
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer in iran: molecular epidemiology and screening strategies.

Authors:  Roya Dolatkhah; Mohammad Hossein Somi; Mortaza Jabbarpour Bonyadi; Iraj Asvadi Kermani; Faris Farassati; Saeed Dastgiri
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 4.  QALY league table of Iran: a practical method for better resource allocation.

Authors:  Reza Hashempour; Behzad Raei; Majid Safaei Lari; Nasrin Abolhasanbeigi Gallezan; Ali AkbariSari
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  Can Opium Use Contribute to a Higher Risk of Colorectal Cancers? A Matched Case-control Study in Iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami; Vahid Yazdi Feyzabadi; Narges Khanjani; Ahad Ashrafi-Asgarabad; Hosniyeh Alizaeh; Vahid Reza Borhaninejad; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Masoud Zeinali; Mohammad Javad Zahedi; Mahmoud Aghaee-Afshar; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Joan Mendivil; Marilena Appierto; Susana Aceituno; Mercè Comas; Montserrat Rué
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.