Literature DB >> 23244034

Paying it forward: generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity.

Kurt Gray1, Adrian F Ward2, Michael I Norton3.   

Abstract

When people are the victims of greed or recipients of generosity, their first impulse is often to pay back that behavior in kind. What happens when people cannot reciprocate, but instead have the chance to be cruel or kind to someone entirely different--to pay it forward? In 5 experiments, participants received greedy, equal, or generous divisions of money or labor from an anonymous person and then divided additional resources with a new anonymous person. While equal treatment was paid forward in kind, greed was paid forward more than generosity. This asymmetry was driven by negative affect, such that a positive affect intervention disrupted the tendency to pay greed forward. Implications for models of generalized reciprocity are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23244034     DOI: 10.1037/a0031047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  22 in total

Review 1.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The limits of racial prejudice.

Authors:  Kevin Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Medical students' empathy positively predicts charitable donation behavior.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Greg J Norman; Jean Decety
Journal:  J Posit Psychol       Date:  2019-08-09

4.  Give what you get: capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and 4-year-old children pay forward positive and negative outcomes to conspecifics.

Authors:  Kristin L Leimgruber; Adrian F Ward; Jane Widness; Michael I Norton; Kristina R Olson; Kurt Gray; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Do good actions inspire good actions in others?

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Alessandra Marcelletti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game.

Authors:  Martin Weiß; Grit Hein; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Detrimental Effects of No Trust: Active Decisions of No Trust Cause Stronger Affective and Behavioral Reactions Than Inactive Decisions.

Authors:  Manon Schutter; Eric van Dijk; Erik W de Kwaadsteniet; Wilco W van Dijk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-07

8.  A Secondary Mixed Methods Analysis of a Pay-it-Forward Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing Program Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China.

Authors:  Katherine T Li; Wenting Huang; Weiming Tang; Feng Wu; Yang Zhao; Dan Wu; Fan Yang; Tiange P Zhang; Laura Forastiere; Marcus Alexander; Navin Kumar; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Five-Year-Old Preschoolers' Sharing is Influenced by Anticipated Reciprocation.

Authors:  Mingrui Xiong; Jiannong Shi; Zhen Wu; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

10.  Pay-it-forward gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Tiange P Zhang; Weiming Tang; Jason J Ong; Marcus Alexander; Laura Forastiere; Navin Kumar; Katherine T Li; Fei Zou; Ligang Yang; Guodong Mi; Yehua Wang; Wenting Huang; Amy Lee; Weizan Zhu; Danyang Luo; Peter Vickerman; Dan Wu; Bin Yang; Nicholas A Christakis; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 25.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.