| Literature DB >> 23243433 |
Varatharajan Rajavel1, Munavvar Zubaid Abdul Sattar, Mahmood Ameen Abdulla, Normadiah M Kassim, Nor Azizan Abdullah.
Abstract
Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) leaves extract (OPLE) has antioxidant properties and because oxidative stress contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (DN), we tested the hypothesis that OPLE prevents diabetes renal oxidative stress, attenuating injury. Sprague-Dawley rats received OPLE (200 and 500 mg kg(-1)) for 4 and 12 weeks after diabetes induction (streptozotocin 60 mg kg(-1)). Blood glucose level, body and kidney weights, urine flow rate (UFR), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and proteinuria were assessed. Oxidative stress variables such as 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), glutathione (GSH), and lipid peroxides (LPO) were quantified. Renal morphology was analysed, and plasma transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) was measured. Diabetic rats demonstrated increase in blood glucose and decreased body and increased kidney weights. Renal dysfunction (proteinuria, elevations in UFR and GFR) was observed in association with increases in LPO, 8-OHdG, and TGF-β1 and a decrease in GSH. Histological evaluation of diabetic kidney demonstrated glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. OPLE attenuated renal dysfunction, improved oxidative stress markers, and reduced renal pathology in diabetic animals. These results suggest OPLE improves renal dysfunction and pathology in diabetes by reducing oxidative stress; furthermore, the protective effect of OPLE against renal damage in diabetes depends on the dose of OPLE as well as progression of DN.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23243433 PMCID: PMC3514844 DOI: 10.1155/2012/195367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effects of OPLE on body and kidney weights, random blood glucose level, and mean arterial pressure.
| Nondiabetic | Diabetic control | Diabetic + OPLE | Diabetic + OPLE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 mg kg−1 | 500 mg kg−1 | |||
| (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | |
| (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | |
| Body weight g | 365.0 ± 14.3 | 309.2 ± 25.4 | 303.3 ± 37.6 | 283.3 ± 17.2 |
| 428.3 ± 13.0 | 235.0 ± 14.6aaa | 251.7 ± 17.2aaa | 289.2 ± 14.9aaa | |
| Kidney weight g 100 g−1 body weight | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.03aa | 0.53 ± 0.04a | 0.59 ± 0.04aa |
| 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.02aaa | 0.62 ± 0.04aaa | 0.59 ± 0.02aaa | |
| Glucose level mmol L−1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 30.7 ± 1.7aaa | 32.2 ± 0.5aaa | 31.2 ± 2.1aaa |
| 6.3 ± 0.2 | 31.0 ± 1.2aaa | 31.6 ± 1.1aaa | 33.1 ± 0.2aaa | |
| Mean arterial pressure mm Hg | 113.2 ± 2.1 | 115.3 ± 3.2 | 109.3 ± 3.7 | 116.7 ± 1.9 |
| 111.5 ± 2.9 | 116.7 ± 3.3 | 109.0 ± 5.3 | 112.2 ± 3.9 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of six experiments for each group. a P < 0.05; aa P < 0.01; aaa P < 0.001 versus corresponding nondiabetic.
Effect of OPLE on renal functional parameters.
| Nondiabetic | Diabetic control | Diabetic + OPLE | Diabetic + OPLE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 mg kg−1 | 500 mg kg−1 | |||
| (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | |
| (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | |
| Renal blood flow mL min−1 g−1 kidney | 1.43 ± 0.10 | 2.27 ± 0.39 | 1.72 ± 0.26 | 1.80 ± 0.03 |
| 1.66 ± 0.14 | 2.49 ± 0.16aaa | 1.78 ± 0.06bb | 1.47 ± 0.05bbb | |
| Glomerular filtration rate mL min−1 g−1 kidney | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.04aa | 0.67 ± 0.07b | 0.63 ± 0.09b |
| 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.06aa | 0.75 ± 0.06a | 0.58 ± 0.02b | |
| Urine flow rate | 3.75 ± 0.59 | 10.68 ± 1.30aaa | 5.27 ± 0.45bb | 5.80 ± 0.80bb |
| 2.89 ± 0.34 | 7.84 ± 0.70aaa | 6.42 ± 0.50aa | 5.29 ± 0.70a,b | |
| Urinary protein excretion mg 2 h−1 | 1.33 ± 0.03 | 6.83 ± 0.30aaa | 2.87 ± 0.17a,bbb | 1.89 ± 0.34bbb |
| 1.13 ± 0.05 | 4.66 ± 0.73aaa | 2.92 ± 0 .26a,b | 2.68 ± 0.21a,bb | |
| Fractional sodium excretion % | 0.63 ± 0.19 | 1.34 ± 0.34 | 0.96 ± 0.22 | 0.90 ± 0.17 |
| 0.56 ± 0.08 | 1.08 ± 0.23 | 0.76 ± 0.24 | 0.79 ± 0.23 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of six experiments for each group. a P < 0.05; aa P < 0.01; aaa P < 0.001 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05; bb P < 0.01; bbb P < 0.001 versus corresponding diabetic control.
Figure 1Effect of OPLE on urinary 8-OHdG concentration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). a P < 0.05; aa P < 0.01; aaa P < 0.001 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05; bb P < 0.01 versus corresponding diabetes control.
Figure 2Effect of OPLE on renal cortical LPO concentration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). aaa P < 0.001 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05, bbb P < 0.001 versus corresponding diabetes control.
Figure 3Effect of OPLE on kidney (renal cortex) GSH concentration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). aa P < 0.01 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05 versus corresponding diabetes control.
Figure 4Plasma TGF-β1 concentration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). a P < 0.05; aa P < 0.01; aaa P < 0.001 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05; bb P < 0.01 versus corresponding diabetes control.
Figure 5Photomicrographs of kidneys stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Masson's trichrome. Nondiabetic (A); diabetic control (B); diabetic + OPLE 200 mg kg−1(C); diabetic + OPLE 500 mg kg−1(D). Bar = 50 μm.
Effects of OPLE on renal structure.
| Nondiabetic | Diabetic control | Diabetic + OPLE | Diabetic + OPLE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 mg kg−1 | 500 mg kg−1 | |||
| (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | (4 week) | |
| (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | (12 week) | |
| Glomerulosclerotic index | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 1.14 ± 0.06aa | 0.89 ± 0.07aa | 0.79 ± 0.5aa,b |
| 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.04aa | 0.93 ± 0.05aa,b | 0.88 ± 0.04aa,b | |
| Tubulointerstitial fibrosis index | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 2.48 ± 0.18aa | 1.48 ± 0.06a,b | 1.16 ± 0.03b |
| 0.61 ± 0.06 | 2.75 ± 0.16a | 1.31 ± 0.23b | 1.05 ± 0.14b |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of six experiments for each group. a P < 0.05,aa P < 0.01 versus corresponding nondiabetic; b P < 0.05 versus corresponding diabetic control.