| Literature DB >> 23243426 |
Prasanna B Galhena1, Sameera R Samarakoon, M Ira Thabrew, G A K Weerasinghe, Mayuri G Thammitiyagodage, W D Ratnasooriya, Kamani H Tennekoon.
Abstract
The present study investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of a polyherbal decoction comprised of Nigella sativa, Hemidesmus indicus, and Smilax glabra in order to justify its claimed antihepatocarcinogenic activity. Activation of hepatic nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), IκB kinase (IKK α/β) proteins, and TNFα and IL-6 expression was investigated in diethylnitrosamine- (DEN-) induced C3H mice-bearing early hepatocarcinogenic changes. Acute phase inflammatory response was evaluated by carrageenan-induced rat paw edema formation. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms were also assessed by determining effect on (a) membrane stabilization, (b) nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory activity, and (c) inhibition of leukocyte migration. A significant inhibition of the paw edema formation was observed in healthy rats as well as in rats bearing early hepatocarcinogenic changes with oral administration of the decoction. As with the positive control, indomethacin (10 mg/kg b.w.) the inhibitory effect was pronounced at 3rd and 4th h after carrageenan injection. A notable IKK α/β mediated hepatic NF-κB inactivation was associated with a significant hepatic TNFα downregulation among mice-bearing hepatocarcinogenic changes subjected to decoction treatment. Inhibition of NO production, leukocyte migration, and membrane stabilization are possible mechanisms by which anti-inflammatory effect is mediated by the decoction. Overall findings imply that anti-inflammatory activity could be one of the mechanisms by which the decoction mediates its antihepatocarcinogenic effects.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23243426 PMCID: PMC3517268 DOI: 10.1155/2012/108626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Schematic presentation of treatment schedule.
Effect of the decoction administration on carrageenan-induced rat paw oedema.
| Treatment groups | Increase in paw edema from the baseline (mean ± SEM), (% inhibition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st h | 2nd h | 3rd h | 4th h | 5th h | |
| Control (normal saline) | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.13 | 0.41 ± 0.12 |
| Decoction control | 0.21 ± 0.04a∗ (33%) | 0.29 ± 0.08a∗∗(30%) | 0.36 ± 0.1a∗∗ (32%) | 0.35 ± 0.12a∗ (26%) | 0.32±0.12NS (22%) |
| Diethylnitrosamine control | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.09 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.21 ± 0.09 |
| Test (DEN + DC) | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.03b∗ (58%) | 0.21 ±0.03b∗ (57%) | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| Indomethacin control | 0.17 ± 0.05a∗∗ (45%) | 0.25 ± 0.07a∗∗ (42%) | 0.23 ± 0.06a∗∗ (57%) | 0.22 ± 0.08a∗∗ (55%) | 0.21 ± 0.04a∗∗ (48%) |
Decoction was administered for 60 min before subplantar carrageenan injection. The change of footpad volume was determined at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h after irritant injection. Each value represents the mean ± SEM of ten rats per group. Statistically significant difference with respect to the controls and expressed as *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired Student's t-test). Figures within parenthesis indicate the differences from normal controls.
aGroups 2 and 5 compared with Group 1.
bGroup 4 compared with Group 3.
Effect of the decoction on human red cell membrane (HRBC) stability.
| Concentration | % Membrane stability | |
|---|---|---|
| Decoction | 62.5 | 16.2 ± 1.6 |
| 125 | 26.4 ± 1.9 | |
| 250 | 39.7 ± 2.8 | |
| 500 | 61.3 ± 4.2 | |
| Diclofenac sodium | 50 | 73.9 ± 3.6 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3/concentration.
Figure 2Inhibitory effect of the decoction on total leukocyte and neutrophil migration induced by carrageenan. Peritonitis was induced by single intraperitoneal injection of carrageenan and cells were counted 2 h later. Decoction (1 g/kg b.w.) was given orally 1 h before inflammatory stimuli. Values are given as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). *P < 0.05 compared to saline, **P < 0.05 compared to carrageenan (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test).
Viability of rat peritoneal cells cultured with different doses of the decoction.
| Treatment groups | Number of live cells (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 1 h | 24 h | ||
| Control | 96.2 ± 1.1 | 94.6 ± 2.6 | 89.3 ± 1.2 | |
| Decoction | 1600 | 43.6 ± 1.9* | 31.7 ± 2.4* | 15.4 ± 2.9* |
| 1200 | 93.6 ± 1.8 | 91.5 ± 1.7 | 87.3 ± 1.3 | |
| 600 | 94.3 ± 2.1 | 90.8 ± 1.9 | 88.4 ± 1.6 | |
| 300 | 92.9 ± 2.4 | 91.1 ± 2.6 | 87.9 ± 2.1 | |
Values are expressed as mean percentage of living cells ± SEM; n = 6/concentration.
*Significant when compared with control; P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of the decoction on in vitro NO production by rat peritoneal cells. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6/concentration. *P < 0.05, when compared with control.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical evaluation of NF-κB nuclear translocation in hepatocytes of C3H mice injected with DEN and subsequently treated with the decoction. Liver sections were incubated with primary antibody to the p 65 subunit of NF-κB as described in the methods. (a) After intraperitoneal injections of DEN (×100), (b) healthy mice (×40), (c) treated with the decoction after intraperitoneal injection of DEN (×100), and (d) negative control; section stained without primary antibody (×100).
Figure 5Activity of Ikk α/β proteins in hepatocytes of C3H mice (a) injected with DEN (×40), (b) Ikk α/β activity of healthy mice (×40), (c) treated with the decoction subsequent to DEN injection (×40), and (d) negative control; section stained without primary antibody (×40).
Figure 6Effect of the decoction on hepatic TNFα and IL-6 expression of C3H mice-bearing DEN induced early hepatocarcinogenic changes. Gene expression has quantified using scanning densitometry. Graph illustrates the mRNA expression of TNFα and IL-6 of each experimental group relative to expression of GAPDH house-keeping gene. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). *P < 0.05 compared to distilled water control (DWC) and **P < 0.05 compared to positive control (DEN) (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest).