Literature DB >> 23243251

Comparison of cumulative drip sampling with whole carcass rinses for estimation of Campylobacter species and quality indicator organisms associated with processed broiler chickens.

J E Line1, B B Oakley, N J Stern.   

Abstract

The whole carcass rinse (WCR) procedure is routinely used as a sampling method for determining the presence and number of quality-indicator organisms or pathogens associated with broiler chicken carcasses in processing facilities. Collection of a cumulative drip sample by placing collection vessels under the processing line could potentially capture a more representative sample of bacterial populations associated with an entire flock with less labor than individual bird rinses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cumulative drip sampling method for recovery of Campylobacter spp. and 3 types of quality indicator organisms from broiler carcasses. Cumulative drip and WCR samples were collected on 14 d from a commercial broiler processing facility over a 3-mo period. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the WCR and cumulative drip sampling methods in recovery of Campylobacter spp., total aerobes, Enterobacteriaceae, or Escherichia coli associated with the postevisceration samples (P > 0.01). Analysis of the pyrosequencing census data demonstrated high interbird variability and indicates cumulative sampling may be required to obtain fully representative sampling of a flock. For most bacterial taxa, the relative abundance in individual WCR was correlated with cumulative drip samples, but some taxa were undercounted or missed entirely by individual WCR. Consequently, individual carcass rinses may not be representative of the flock microbial community. The cumulative drip sampling technique may save labor and provide a more representative summary of process control in poultry processing facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23243251     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  3 in total

1.  Assessing Salmonella prevalence and complexity through processing using different culture methods.

Authors:  Surendra Rasamsetti; Mark E Berrang; Nelson A Cox; Nikki W Shariat
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics.

Authors:  Amélie Rouger; Odile Tresse; Monique Zagorec
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-08-25

3.  The poultry-associated microbiome: network analysis and farm-to-fork characterizations.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Cesar A Morales; J Line; Mark E Berrang; Richard J Meinersmann; Glenn E Tillman; Mark G Wise; Gregory R Siragusa; Kelli L Hiett; Bruce S Seal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.