OBJECTIVE: To evaluate chronic illness care delivery from the patient's perspective and to examine its main correlates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study using questionnaires and medical chart review. SETTING: Nine teaching family practices in Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 364 patients with diabetes, hypertension, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Score on the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire, which evaluates the patient's perspective on the care received based on the chronic care model (CCM); patients characteristics (sex, level of education, number of chronic illnesses); patient-physician relationship (relational continuity, interpersonal communication assessed from the patient's perspective); and interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care abstracted from patients' medical charts. RESULTS: The mean PACIC score obtained (2.8 out of 5) indicates that, on average, CCM-concordant care "generally did not occur" or occurred only "sometimes" in this network of teaching practices. However, with a mean technical quality-of-care score of nearly 80%, physicians in this network showed a high degree of adherence to clinical guidelines for the chronic illnesses under study. Patient education level lower than high school was negatively associated with PACIC scores, while positive associations were found with male sex, number of chronic illnesses, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, interdisciplinary care, and technical quality of care. CONCLUSION: Patients with less education reported receiving less CCM-concordant care. The patient-physician relationship was the strongest correlate of PACIC scores, while interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care had modest contributions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate chronic illness care delivery from the patient's perspective and to examine its main correlates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study using questionnaires and medical chart review. SETTING: Nine teaching family practices in Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 364 patients with diabetes, hypertension, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Score on the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire, which evaluates the patient's perspective on the care received based on the chronic care model (CCM); patients characteristics (sex, level of education, number of chronic illnesses); patient-physician relationship (relational continuity, interpersonal communication assessed from the patient's perspective); and interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care abstracted from patients' medical charts. RESULTS: The mean PACIC score obtained (2.8 out of 5) indicates that, on average, CCM-concordant care "generally did not occur" or occurred only "sometimes" in this network of teaching practices. However, with a mean technical quality-of-care score of nearly 80%, physicians in this network showed a high degree of adherence to clinical guidelines for the chronic illnesses under study. Patient education level lower than high school was negatively associated with PACIC scores, while positive associations were found with male sex, number of chronic illnesses, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, interdisciplinary care, and technical quality of care. CONCLUSION:Patients with less education reported receiving less CCM-concordant care. The patient-physician relationship was the strongest correlate of PACIC scores, while interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care had modest contributions.
Authors: David Litaker; Lorraine Mion; Loretta Planavsky; Christopher Kippes; Neil Mehta; Joseph Frolkis Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Denis E O'Donnell; Shawn Aaron; Jean Bourbeau; Paul Hernandez; Darcy Marciniuk; Meyer Balter; Gordon Ford; Andre Gervais; Roger Goldstein; Rick Hodder; Francois Maltais; Jeremy Road; Valoree McKay; Jennifer Schenkel; Annon Ariel; Anna Day; Yves Lacasse; Robert Levy; Dale Lien; John Miller; Graeme Rocker; Tasmin Sinuff; Paula Stewart; Nha Voduc; Raja Abboud; Amnon Ariel; Margo Becklake; Elizabeth Borycki; Dina Brooks; Shirley Bryan; Luanne Calcutt; Ken Chapman; Nozhat Choudry; Alan Couet; Steven Coyle; Arthur Craig; Ian Crawford; Mervyn Dean; Ronald Grossman; Jan Haffner; Daren Heyland; Donna Hogg; Martin Holroyde; Alan Kaplan; John Kayser; Dale Lein; Josiah Lowry; Les McDonald; Alan MacFarlane; Andrew McIvor; John Rea; Darlene Reid; Michel Rouleau; Lorelei Samis; Don Sin; Katherine Vandemheen; J A Wedzicha; Karl Weiss Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Nadia A Khan; Finlay A McAlister; Norman R C Campbell; Ross D Feldman; Simon Rabkin; Jeff Mahon; Richard Lewanczuk; Kelly B Zarnke; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Marcel Lebel; Mitchell Levine; Carol Herbert Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Janie Houle; François Lauzier-Jobin; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Sophie Meunier; Simon Coulombe; José Côté; François Lespérance; Jean-Louis Chiasson; Louis Bherer; Jean Lambert Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2016-05-11
Authors: Amédé Gogovor; Regina Visca; Mark A Ware; Marie-France Valois; Gillian Bartlett; Matthew Hunt; Sara Ahmed Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Charles Batte; John Mukisa; Natalie Rykiel; David Mukunya; William Checkley; Felix Knauf; Robert Kalyesubula; Trishul Siddharthan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 3.295