BACKGROUND: This manuscript is a review of different surgical techniques to manage perforated colon diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the benefits and disadvantages of different surgical treatments for Hinchey III or IV type of colon diverticulitis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Science Citation Index (1990 and 2011). A total of 1,809 publications were identified and 14 studies with 1,041 patients were included in the study. Any surgical treatment was considered in this review. Mortality was considered the primary outcome, whereas hospital stay and reoperation rate were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Primary resection with anastomosis has a significant advantage in terms of lower mortality rate with respect to Hartmann's procedure (P = 0.02). The postoperative length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the resection with anastomosis group (P < 0.001). Different findings have emerged from studies of patients with the primary resection with anastomosis vs laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and subsequent resection: overall surgical morbidity and hospital stay were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group compared to the primary resection and anastomosis group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous published articles on operative treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis, we found a marked heterogeneity between included studies limiting the possibility to summarize in a metanalytical method the data provided and make difficult to synthesize data in a quantitative fashion. The advantages in the group of colon resection with primary anastomosis in terms of lower mortality rate and postoperative stay should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate different surgical treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis.
BACKGROUND: This manuscript is a review of different surgical techniques to manage perforated colon diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the benefits and disadvantages of different surgical treatments for Hinchey III or IV type of colon diverticulitis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Science Citation Index (1990 and 2011). A total of 1,809 publications were identified and 14 studies with 1,041 patients were included in the study. Any surgical treatment was considered in this review. Mortality was considered the primary outcome, whereas hospital stay and reoperation rate were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Primary resection with anastomosis has a significant advantage in terms of lower mortality rate with respect to Hartmann's procedure (P = 0.02). The postoperative length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the resection with anastomosis group (P < 0.001). Different findings have emerged from studies of patients with the primary resection with anastomosis vs laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and subsequent resection: overall surgical morbidity and hospital stay were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group compared to the primary resection and anastomosis group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous published articles on operative treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis, we found a marked heterogeneity between included studies limiting the possibility to summarize in a metanalytical method the data provided and make difficult to synthesize data in a quantitative fashion. The advantages in the group of colon resection with primary anastomosis in terms of lower mortality rate and postoperative stay should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate different surgical treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis.
Authors: Vasilis A Constantinides; Paris P Tekkis; Thanos Athanasiou; Omer Aziz; Sanjay Purkayastha; Feza H Remzi; Victor W Fazio; Nail Aydin; Ara Darzi; Asha Senapati Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Sven Richter; Werner Lindemann; Otto Kollmar; Georg A Pistorius; Christoph A Maurer; Martin K Schilling Journal: World J Surg Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Alexander Perathoner; Alexander Klaus; Gilbert Mühlmann; Michael Oberwalder; Raimund Margreiter; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: R Cirocchi; S Di Saverio; D G Weber; R Taboła; I Abraha; J Randolph; A Arezzo; G A Binda Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Nicolás H Dreifuss; Francisco Schlottmann; Jose M Piatti; Maximiliano E Bun; Nicolás A Rotholtz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Anthony B Mozer; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Megan E Sippey; Adam Celio; Mark L Manwaring; Kevin R Kasten Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Maximilian Sohn; I Iesalnieks; A Agha; P Steiner; A Hochrein; J Pratschke; P Ritschl; F Aigner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.352