Andreas Skyschally1, Barbara Walter, Gerd Heusch. 1. Institute for Pathophysiology, University of Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: Reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction impacts not only on the myocardium but also on the coronary microcirculation, and microembolization from the culprit lesion contributes to microvascular obstruction. Prior experimental studies have not accounted for microembolization in ischaemia/reperfusion injury and not considered microembolization as a confounder and target of protection by ischaemic postconditioning. We therefore investigated the impact of microembolization during reperfusion on infarct size and cardioprotection by postconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anaesthetized, open-chest pigs were subjected to 90 min low-flow ischaemia. Immediate full reperfusion (n = 8) served as the control. Microembolization was induced by intracoronary infusion of 42 µm microspheres with the onset of reperfusion (n = 8). In a second step, postconditioning was induced by six cycles of 20s reperfusion/20s re-occlusion without (n = 8) and with superimposed microembolization (n = 8). Transmural blood flow and area at risk were determined by radioactive microspheres, infarct size by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. Area at risk and transmural blood flow were not different between groups. Microembolization increased infarct size from 32 ± 3% of the area at risk to 47 ± 3% (P < 0.05). Embolizing particles were re-distributed away from the central infarcted area and accumulated in the infarct border, thus contributing to infarct extension. Postconditioning reduced infarct size without (21 ± 3%; P < 0.05 vs. immediate full reperfusion) and also with additional microembolization (26 ± 5%; P < 0.05 vs. immediate full reperfusion and microembolization); embolizing particles did not accumulate in the infarct border. CONCLUSION: Microembolization at reperfusion augments infarct size, but postconditioning in the presence of microembolization still reduces infarct size and attenuates infarct expansion.
AIMS: Reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction impacts not only on the myocardium but also on the coronary microcirculation, and microembolization from the culprit lesion contributes to microvascular obstruction. Prior experimental studies have not accounted for microembolization in ischaemia/reperfusion injury and not considered microembolization as a confounder and target of protection by ischaemic postconditioning. We therefore investigated the impact of microembolization during reperfusion on infarct size and cardioprotection by postconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anaesthetized, open-chest pigs were subjected to 90 min low-flow ischaemia. Immediate full reperfusion (n = 8) served as the control. Microembolization was induced by intracoronary infusion of 42 µm microspheres with the onset of reperfusion (n = 8). In a second step, postconditioning was induced by six cycles of 20s reperfusion/20s re-occlusion without (n = 8) and with superimposed microembolization (n = 8). Transmural blood flow and area at risk were determined by radioactive microspheres, infarct size by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. Area at risk and transmural blood flow were not different between groups. Microembolization increased infarct size from 32 ± 3% of the area at risk to 47 ± 3% (P < 0.05). Embolizing particles were re-distributed away from the central infarcted area and accumulated in the infarct border, thus contributing to infarct extension. Postconditioning reduced infarct size without (21 ± 3%; P < 0.05 vs. immediate full reperfusion) and also with additional microembolization (26 ± 5%; P < 0.05 vs. immediate full reperfusion and microembolization); embolizing particles did not accumulate in the infarct border. CONCLUSION: Microembolization at reperfusion augments infarct size, but postconditioning in the presence of microembolization still reduces infarct size and attenuates infarct expansion.
Authors: Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Derek J Hausenloy; William Chilian; Filippo Crea; Sean M Davidson; Peter Ferdinandy; David Garcia-Dorado; Niels van Royen; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Jaroslaw Zalewski; Piet Claus; Jan Bogaert; Nina Vanden Driessche; Ronald B Driesen; Diogo T Galan; Karin R Sipido; Piotr Buszman; Krzysztof Milewski; Frans Van de Werf Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Ewa Soltysinska; Bo Hjorth Bentzen; Maria Barthmes; Helle Hattel; A Brianne Thrush; Mary-Ellen Harper; Klaus Qvortrup; Filip J Larsen; Tomas A Schiffer; Jose Losa-Reyna; Julia Straubinger; Angelina Kniess; Morten Bækgaard Thomsen; Andrea Brüggemann; Stefanie Fenske; Martin Biel; Peter Ruth; Christian Wahl-Schott; Robert Christopher Boushel; Søren-Peter Olesen; Robert Lukowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240