Literature DB >> 23241465

Crisis communication: an inequalities perspective on the 2010 Boston water crisis.

Ezequiel M Galarce1, K Viswanath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the field of crisis risk communication has generated substantial research, the interaction between social determinants, communication processes, and behavioral compliance has been less well studied. With the goal of better understanding these interactions, this report examines how social determinants influenced communications and behavioral compliance during the 2010 Boston, Massachusetts, water crisis.
METHODS: An online survey was conducted to assess Boston residents' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, mass and interpersonal communication, and preventive behaviors on emergency preparedness topics dealing with the water crisis. Of a total sample of 726 respondents, approximately one-third (n = 267) reported having been affected by the water crisis. Only data from affected participants were analyzed.
RESULTS: Following an order to boil water, 87.5% of respondents refrained from drinking unboiled tap water. These behaviors and other cognitive and attitudinal factors, however, were not uniform across population subgroups. All communication and behavioral compliance variables varied across sociodemographic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Crisis communication, in conjunction with other public health preparedness fields, is central to reducing the negative impact of sudden hazards. Emergency scenarios such as the Boston water crisis serve as unique opportunities to understand how effectively crisis messages are conveyed to and received by different segments of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23241465     DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2012.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   1.385


  5 in total

1.  Communication problems after the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011.

Authors:  Hitoshi Yamamura; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Yasumitsu Mizobata
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.385

2.  Self-reported household impacts of large-scale chemical contamination of the public water supply, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.

Authors:  Charles P Schade; Nasandra Wright; Rahul Gupta; David A Latif; Ayan Jha; John Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Leesa Lin; Elena Savoia; Foluso Agboola; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The effectiveness of disaster risk communication: a systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Declan T Bradley; Marie McFarland; Mike Clarke
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-08-22

5.  Public response to the 2014 chemical spill in West Virginia: knowledge, opinions and behaviours.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Michael A Stoto; Rahul Gupta; Nasandra Wright; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.