Literature DB >> 23241303

A new methodology for costing wound care.

Keith Harding1, John Posnett2, Katherine Vowden2.   

Abstract

Increasing pressure on health care budgets highlights the need for clinicians to understand the true costs of wound care, in order to be able to defend services against indiscriminate cost cutting. Our aim was to develop and test a straightforward method of measuring treatment costs, which is feasible in routine practice. The method was tested in a prospective study of leg ulcer patients attending three specialist clinics in the UK. A set of ulcer-related health state descriptors were defined on the basis that they represented distinct and clinically relevant descriptions of wound condition ['healed', 'progressing'; 'static''deteriorating; 'severe' (ulcer with serious complications)]. A standardised data-collection instrument was used to record information for all patients attending the clinic during the study period regarding (i) the health state of the ulcer; (ii) treatment received during the clinic visit and (iii) treatment planned between clinic visits. Information on resource use was used to estimate weekly treatment costs by ulcer state. Information was collected at 827 independent weekly observations from the three study centres. Treatment costs increased markedly with ulcer severity: an ulcer which was 'deteriorating' or 'severe' cost between twice and six times as much per week as an ulcer which was progressing normally towards healing. Higher costs were driven primarily by more frequent clinic visits and by the costs of hospitalisation for ulcers with severe complications. This exercise has demonstrated that the proposed methodology is easy to apply, and produces information which is of value in monitoring healing and in potentially reducing treatment costs.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Ulcers; Wound care; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23241303      PMCID: PMC7950584          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  1 in total

1.  Annual costs of treatment for venous leg ulcers in Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall; Jonas Hjelmgren
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

  1 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia.

Authors:  Rosana E Norman; Michelle Gibb; Anthony Dyer; Jennifer Prentice; Stephen Yelland; Qinglu Cheng; Peter A Lazzarini; Keryln Carville; Karen Innes-Walker; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Edward Burn; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The financial and quality-of-life cost to patients living with a chronic wound in the community.

Authors:  Suzanne Kapp; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Combined use of hyperbaric oxygen and sprayed keratinocyte suspension to tackle a difficult wound.

Authors:  P C Jackson; D Wilks; J Rawlins; P L Matteucci
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Extracellular matrix assessment of infected chronic venous leg ulcers: role of metalloproteinases and inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  Raffaele Serra; Raffaele Grande; Gianluca Buffone; Vincenzo Molinari; Paolo Perri; Aldina Perri; Bruno Amato; Manuela Colosimo; Stefano de Franciscis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Safety and performance evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Keith G Harding; Marek Szczepkowski; Jacek Mikosiński; Krystyna Twardowska-Saucha; Stephen Blair; Nicola M Ivins; Wojciech Saucha; Jane Cains; Kim Peters; David Parsons; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Ulcer healing time and antibiotic treatment before and after the introduction of the Registry of Ulcer Treatment: an improvement project in a national quality registry in Sweden.

Authors:  Rut F Oien; Henrik W Forssell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Biofilm delays wound healing: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-06-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.